Re: 答复: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 01:41 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F3F11E82E1 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.273, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MsXJ0816VKaJ for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA3411E80F9 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7fe28e000000d82-5d-5265d7de3545
Received: from EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.96]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 07.F9.03458.ED7D5625; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:41:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB101.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.118]) by EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.96]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:41:49 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: Yangang <yangang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
Thread-Topic: 答复: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
Thread-Index: AQHOzf/GzJU1wXMyskyzrVWgwEKZ4Zn+q2CAgAGIPICAAAMvgA==
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:41:49 +0000
Message-ID: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE47030A2579@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
References: <D496C972D1A13540A730720631EC73413A39ECE3@nkgeml507-mbs.china.huawei.com> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE470309F337@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <D496C972D1A13540A730720631EC73413A39EF60@nkgeml507-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <D496C972D1A13540A730720631EC73413A39EF60@nkgeml507-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E3375A4C2C5945448DDF295473C3221B@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPgu6966lBBqdmSltcePOb2aLnyRVm izffbrA5MHu0HHnL6rFkyU+mAKYoLpuU1JzMstQifbsErow500+yFpxTqljw9S97A+MdxS5G Tg4JAROJL5OOskHYYhIX7q0Hsrk4hASOMko83nWHBcJZzijReWsGC0gVm4COxPNH/5hBbBEB BYmG+/1gcWaBJInFO9rYQRqEBTYwSnRsuArmiAhsZJS4/n8uYxcjB5DjJLF9VzpIA4uAqsSa lx/AmnkFfCWmTTzJBLHtKVD9hwawDZwCYRK/17eBFTEC3ff91BomiG3iEreezGeCuFtAYsme 88wQtqjEy8f/WCFsZYklT/azgOxlFtCUWL9LH8K0lui7lAoxRVFiSvdDdogTBCVOznzCMoFR fBaSBbMQmmchNM9C0jwLSfMCRtZVjBylxalluelGhpsYgdF1TILNcQfjgk+WhxilOViUxHm/ vHUOEhJITyxJzU5NLUgtii8qzUktPsTIxMEp1cBozrB3auGu+lBxn+qXJVMEVJPuvtWYfWOD 9pVCFlfm9yqmzc3TJgm7rdHrWjmtjOdfTOP6ow+myvVu6+dKKu+XnH1syw3F18x3o8/fe5Tt 4LpF4WXW/ucva48z9STOZpdKVHw3n9/TPTn+YvpuSy7e5SfPynoxfXumLav661X7lGuJO3va ZhxQYinOSDTUYi4qTgQA3R4W+XwCAAA=
Cc: "Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)" <zhangxudong@huawei.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:41:56 -0000

I'm aware of the basic premise of the two drafts and was not asking for you to restate the obvious. Specifically, what are the benefits and determents of your draft when compared to RFC 6976? 
Acee

On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Yangang wrote:

> Our draft is similar with section 6.1 in RFC5715, the cost of changed link will be adjusted and advertised, maybe more than one time, this sequence will base on some pre-calculations. But in RFC 6976, each device should calculate the distance with the failue link, base on this distance, each device decide when the FIB will be updated.
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee.lindem@ericsson.com] 
> 发送时间: 2013年10月21日 10:07
> 收件人: Yangang
> 抄送: rtgwg@ietf.org; Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)
> 主题: Re: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
> 
> Can you contrast this with RFC 6976? You include RFC 6976 in the Normative References but it is never referenced (this will show up if you run idnits). 
> Acee 
> On Oct 20, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Yangang wrote:
> 
>> Hi:
>> 
>> We had submitted the a new draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00, we want to discuss the micro-loop problem through another method. Your feedback and comments on the rtgwg mailing list are appreciated. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Rahul.Yan
>> 
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
>> 发送时间: 2013年10月18日 15:47
>> 收件人: Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP); Yangang
>> 主题: New Version Notification for draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Xudong Zhang and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Filename:	 draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment
>> Revision:	 00
>> Title:		 Algorithm for Ordered Metric Adjustment
>> Creation date:	 2013-10-18
>> Group:		 Individual Submission
>> Number of pages: 10
>> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
>> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment
>> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
>> 
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  Upon link down event or link up event, each device in network
>>  individually schedules route calculation.  Because of different
>>  hardware capabilities and internal/external environments, the time to
>>  update forwarding entries on these devices are disordered which can
>>  cause a transient forwarding loop.  This document introduces a method
>>  to prevent forwarding loop by adjusting link metric gradually for
>>  several times.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtgwg mailing list
>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>