RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com> Fri, 01 December 2017 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CB0129417; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:31:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eLw0B_JJ_MUx; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:31:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93483129412; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 988B4159B98B0; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:31:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:31:35 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([]) by SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:31:26 -0800
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: "rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa@ietf.org>
Subject: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
Thread-Topic: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
Thread-Index: AQHTauu9R23laVmwZUaixe7xOAEAoQ==
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:31:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CE29DD16-62BA-4588-89C3-9F377FA36A88@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE29DD1662BA458889C39F377FA36A88huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/6nPuF7WqSkDYYpwacPgxrAgv-bw>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 21:31:41 -0000


The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa. Since both Jeff and Chris are author/contributor of this draft, I’ll be running the LC.

There was consensus that document is ready for the last call and the authors have resolved all the comments from shepherd review.
Please indicate support or no-support by December 18, 2017.

An IPR call has been done in October, all co-authors have responded except Shraddha Hegde (please let me know if I overlooked your response).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor and haven’t responded to the IPR call, please respond to this
email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.


rtgwg mailing list