RE: Asking for a slot in IETF101

Haoyu song <haoyu.song@huawei.com> Fri, 02 March 2018 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <haoyu.song@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AF9126C22 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 11:56:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FaGIPoPrzyjg for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 11:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C0FA124217 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 11:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9EBCDF450C5D8 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 19:56:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 19:56:02 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.91]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.93]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 11:55:58 -0800
From: Haoyu song <haoyu.song@huawei.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Asking for a slot in IETF101
Thread-Topic: Asking for a slot in IETF101
Thread-Index: AdOyX44O3ptm8oroRoqTtCvIZFoCXgAAJgSAAAAGQmA=
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 19:55:57 +0000
Message-ID: <78A2745BE9B57D4F9D27F86655EB87F937491B76@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
References: <78A2745BE9B57D4F9D27F86655EB87F937491B20@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com> <26128175-7BF7-42E3-B0C2-AC3D124CE889@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <26128175-7BF7-42E3-B0C2-AC3D124CE889@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.193.217.120]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_78A2745BE9B57D4F9D27F86655EB87F937491B76SJCEML521MBBchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/7hEixnsPpSn3BKaziI5v4yQaJ1A>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 19:56:08 -0000

Hi Acee,

We also apply a slot in OPSAWG. Since the audience may be different for the two groups, we’d like to present in both. Thanks!

Haoyu

From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 11:54 AM
To: Haoyu song <haoyu.song@huawei.com>om>; rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Asking for a slot in IETF101

Why aren’t you presenting in an OPS area group?

Acee

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Haoyu song <haoyu.song@huawei.com<mailto:haoyu.song@huawei.com>>
Date: Friday, March 2, 2018 at 2:50 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Subject: Asking for a slot in IETF101

Dear RTGWG Chairs,
I’m writing to ask for a presentation slot for the draft of “Toward a Network Telemetry Framework” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-ntf/)
Thank you very much for the consideration!
Best regards,
Haoyu Song