Re: DC Routing requirements draft

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 11 November 2017 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3461270A0; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:47:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hNR8p2vYg2qt; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA8EC1200C1; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id y5so8659417pgq.7; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:47:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+aqBXnN2H/j/6nq59Oyb/GfLdDC+V6brFj5RWmNNVxI=; b=imyQEniWGLdy0Y4PawFWITEBZX0Sw+N5UxWFsk0M0/bT14ZSR6nnfRbJdXcSPILp2R YOX9OXyGxMN7K6vLVW1BJptoWbS/k3bCCzuhSl37Dznphi1Tn6VLxYUQ9Nxu0Z5EVnrF sdzX2/ggb5Ut4aoAPzVJoxCpj49UqlmQzvAijOQiuW/V7ABO+ptvRzRqKf2GadHLCSml ZGhlGvx1RCbvPwC1PZzZBsImoyymOOZaWRUjtSilFYBHuuvxRhDwmgZlgm9DZCas83qr BrfHr/QEiFekJNj5VqBsS55spYo1d9nX341O9zIchai1+aFSuTeB4fJSAu/qX2HYuMm1 1bwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+aqBXnN2H/j/6nq59Oyb/GfLdDC+V6brFj5RWmNNVxI=; b=hleX4UaHywYhpK1oNyzI3a41vMNlBXmRyV41kzXUJgi00cMUOPnEdfYv/Yi6BQpZvx 3Xpu/60osI/5TnuY1Eblh14MpCc9oMWHyGnRSh8RB9FuSJCz6c1pLFxRc0jmMvSHlu9y 0SrLn/MgT+Sr/I9irr3PqGbcz+AruImHNcq0VuZja/ELooB6WhvR/L806aWXWuKeKGEv BLAjEhSyM35P8igOzwetkXrtkPa/ALZ7MfrHDAn5P1aYxk/G76Z06DIzSmc34hrLB47L V694o1yyprlTIFl81Xsm0ubmSWtirJGCnS0R06arh2mfPoS0uJ/06IPF8Ra59G3tBF07 IR4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX41rtbT5TmKh2mM/nIhMReBMkkmPswihLRNWNrf2b+WyMTfz7hk Ne46siqn2hLcmkKnQnSv06MZc+ob
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZEkQvWqlADSL0DpWhhepb2V8J466NFZgjNCnIj8WhMT3SN7qemt3vRMvjz23sO/XDDTT3zrQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.47.6 with SMTP id v6mr2115735pgv.452.1510364844448; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.130.25] ([101.100.166.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h1sm19941036pfg.143.2017.11.10.17.47.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:47:23 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 09:47:20 +0800
Subject: Re: DC Routing requirements draft
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Yi Yang <yyietf@gmail.com>
CC: Dcrouting <dcrouting-bounces@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <62463820-6C61-4E61-8BDC-917D045815CB@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: DC Routing requirements draft
References: <5C6D0957-6C0B-453C-8547-6ED9347D3D8E@gmail.com> <C3E3BD31-669A-4787-991A-879ED9284B27@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C3E3BD31-669A-4787-991A-879ED9284B27@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/7qjSrjgXAXl-KbvyjWH5-keKTP4>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 01:47:26 -0000

Hi Yi,

yes, correct.

Cheers,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Yi Yang <yyietf@gmail.com>;
Date: Saturday, November 11, 2017 at 05:25
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>;
Cc: Dcrouting <dcrouting-bounces@ietf.org>;, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>;
Subject: Re: DC Routing requirements draft

    Hi Jeff,
    
    This is probably obvious, but it might be worth to clarify — the convergence time requirement is for a single event, right?
    
    Yi
    
    > On Oct 30, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
    > 
    > All,
    > 
    > We have just published DC Routing requirements draft (draft-dt-rtgwg-dcrouting-requirements) that is going to be presented at the upcoming BoF in Singapore.
    > Please note that EDCO group (draft-elkins-routing-brickmortar-topology) input was not included and will have a separate track.
    > 
    > Your comments and suggestions are very welcome.
    > 
    > draft co-authors
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > rtgwg mailing list
    > rtgwg@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg