IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Poll for WG adoption of draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 24 August 2015 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB481B29B8; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UkBZK2bhhnHs; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5F81B29B4; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8727; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1440444710; x=1441654310; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=kodeDcdagS0qqCyWOkDf57q2yhDyHARZ76kKZCKn0oU=; b=DwPNOXdMn8k8kGLTDXTZkwgPMurKhLeMIe9kB/mC15JmIruV5dG0AS10 6XpReIIkjeQ8AtXJV+okv5r74WqkqfCgMrsv5qcRQXpOR1dDh6+A5OXgO MyKfJLIjICHbVbV8++5tT4Vh5T9NxQef4eFPSl+W0TT1lj71smUhwJ4yF g=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A8BQCCcNtV/4sNJK1dgk5NVGkGgx+6WIFtAQmFewKBNDkTAQEBAQEBAYEKhCMBAQEDAQEBASBLBgUFCwIBCA4KJwMCAicLFBEBAQQOBQ6IGAgNsXqVIgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEi1eEJxEBTQQHgmkvgRQFlTQBgj+BXGqHbIFLhDCQa4NqJoN+cYEOOoEEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,740,1432598400"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="23139108"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2015 19:31:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7OJVnYn008132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:31:49 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:31:48 -0500
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (173.37.183.77) by xch-aln-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:31:48 -0500
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.173]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:31:48 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: Poll for WG adoption of draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01
Thread-Topic: Poll for WG adoption of draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01
Thread-Index: AdDemvNsX+Y1YhwMR72RZWnKbKz9ygAMnjYA
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:31:47 +0000
Message-ID: <81BC84D4-B7ED-45D8-B1CA-6005160BAF5B@cisco.com>
References: <BLUPR05MB29263C888FBB793BCE8B1A3A9620@BLUPR05MB292.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR05MB29263C888FBB793BCE8B1A3A9620@BLUPR05MB292.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.102.25]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_88B69474-1C17-4AEF-B8BD-43AF1B4B1CE6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/7tNTAs8kt2zW6AjpNCc44ezof8Q>
Cc: "draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing@ietf.org" <draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing@ietf.org>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:31:52 -0000

I'm in favor.

> On Aug 24, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> RTGWG,
> 
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01 as a working group document.
> 
> “Destination/Source Routing”
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/>
> 
> As was discussed in Prague, this draft is needed to support work in homenet.  It  is outside of the scope of homenet’s charter, but within the scope of RTGWG’s charter.
> 
> Please send comments to the list and state your support or opposition to RTGWG adoption of this draft.
> 
> This poll runs through the end of Monday, September 7th.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.  The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris and Jeff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email