RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps

"UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com> Thu, 07 April 2022 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ju1738@att.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1F43A0F61; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.805
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.805 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=att.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEeLcXmPuCsX; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E1A3A0F47; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0288871.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0288871.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 237G1bja030819; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:45:35 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0288871.ppops.net-00191d01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fa347syrp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 12:45:35 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 237GjVdj019245; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:45:34 -0400
Received: from zlp30488.vci.att.com (zlp30488.vci.att.com [135.47.91.93]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 237GjP2x018935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:45:25 -0400
Received: from zlp30488.vci.att.com (zlp30488.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30488.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 214D140173AD; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:45:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGED2DA.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [135.50.89.138]) by zlp30488.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id AAB8140170D7; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:45:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGED2CC.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.134) by GAALPA1MSGED2DA.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:45:16 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGETA02.tmg.ad.att.com (144.160.249.124) by GAALPA1MSGED2CC.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:45:16 -0400
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.173) by edgeal2.exch.att.com (144.160.249.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:44:42 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=lu4LO03Mw6xSDDaD6cArfZe4nWC9qM0SRNqILAin9So+fvrW7T52WnJRFanfVHYZmZobLjgsisKfZtvudttk7uolM/i9vckNWgtHZ+nz4sN88LLCE/bcf87j/XOProWL9XPX8LyRF3uo4swjRQ62tuDEx7HU+QTAUFBj2P2xrJqpTQr0jWnoQhT+YRBxHVwiE68URDycQ3YDn5hr1QEEstkjzpPOVEcZ8rKcy3rmNzkf5wTBUJScCHrSsro7wnZjQ6n19V5ea0qwl3rkwWSDSUX8V5gsLfjOyL+0uAlCUgMUE3IFt2YJk3ObNcAmBqcMwgG2I6bJPCFO5O4xB4JEJg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=/VRIoMSR4gvACvh01aHj3UzaU7JtsUl70iVVQzj1PW0=; b=DKf7y5mcqfcUSNvi2HFfgxgSs4usig/npQSoDEfG2hzEivxGPhSoGKi2iY/VxWao6tgx+b6BMtVECpeOuX/DD2eoVbe49NEVvaeKwo4zpOMHR7qxQPtxXN4Kr+MeyqsYf/u2STEPIaPeah2J+mT9onFasD2bTytipAQp9wyXHuw8UC7uQqcXlQrJ6im2T4oD0TBEAC8nf8giYmeO4EH7wBjm6C6o3B4ZQ474MX+SSRqSh/uz1dSdsudZKwh+6DZRHnp5cazX4LO5DDGipYDyysrekgpZbr/EDok3lsv+SGqOPM6pzRH9AGgtWesRZrIwNUETqqLfwM8KcAwpmm3jeQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=att.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=att.com; dkim=pass header.d=att.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-att-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=/VRIoMSR4gvACvh01aHj3UzaU7JtsUl70iVVQzj1PW0=; b=dHfZN/YBhjugUrQfSkCWqhT5bq2qlU7lNJSl3lw7OsUIbzrE0Up9nummYjkftOALt8356zz/iDx2PjUpOc3P9y4gsxMmI0D6zhCPSpc91r/azLwNmEhqcLv0Bs9T5m0gKCeI7HjgVjH62y/hFXZx9skF7gEtNwD8PbwwVi9ax+U=
Received: from MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:7d::7) by DM6PR02MB5098.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:46::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5144.22; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:44:41 +0000
Received: from MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8053:3fde:4125:9767]) by MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8053:3fde:4125:9767%4]) with mapi id 15.20.5144.022; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:44:41 +0000
From: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
CC: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
Thread-Topic: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
Thread-Index: AQHYSRDGyrbYK1Nxpk2NMF8ilWWszqzkQmcAgABbeoCAAAJzgIAACuoA
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:44:41 +0000
Message-ID: <MW4PR02MB7394A437B39C21D8BCE8EDA1C6E69@MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <204D8DE6-F51C-4551-B1D7-1D69DBCA3626@hxcore.ol> <CAOj+MMEv=qjPzv9jiadmjP7dXQjvA3QOdP=Bv3TCZ9c-NgPwng@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR13MB4920576A465BAF92FAF0060E85E69@CO1PR13MB4920.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMH8pQ88_mkRNjgsUdLFQiBfSG3DwVuxcEc6+rbG-Dmyww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMH8pQ88_mkRNjgsUdLFQiBfSG3DwVuxcEc6+rbG-Dmyww@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bf783758-abee-4503-7df1-08da18b5e9bb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR02MB5098:EE_
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR02MB5098EADAED649EC5BE680982C6E69@DM6PR02MB5098.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(366004)(38070700005)(9686003)(66446008)(66556008)(66946007)(76116006)(66476007)(64756008)(4326008)(8676002)(71200400001)(53546011)(6506007)(83380400001)(7696005)(86362001)(508600001)(5660300002)(8936002)(52536014)(33656002)(186003)(2906002)(82202003)(26005)(966005)(82960400001)(316002)(122000001)(38100700002)(55016003)(54906003)(110136005)(166002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: =?utf-8?B?VVE0a1BuancxQVpsREJJZnptQi9ZQlJmZWlONUVpNndmbFRLN3M0L0pxb3cr?= =?utf-8?B?RmlkVzhUVnBrTnNFcTJwVWgxa0pjL3RYZWpsbHFMM1dwcHdkdExFMzdJRWdH?= =?utf-8?B?L1gyN0l0aklnazdZdFJ4djlyNFVQUGRITUd5c2tmZHJiTE1oSVhnY1Vnc2pN?= =?utf-8?B?TnRiaUhqNWF3MzBva3pvWDIrZFA5b1VKRXIzc2UxWTl2UzJ4cXAwQjJPRjRk?= =?utf-8?B?dGZ3akg4MHYzcjRRaEd5NnR1WHV3S0ticjlLNWpxWExWc1huZkxRWDU0bjc4?= =?utf-8?B?eHdGdFQySW9PV3U2SzVaWVVDK0hIT0ZWZWdXa3piY2JVQlR3S1FmRml4bXIx?= =?utf-8?B?bzRWREVMbWQ3RW5oTFBmK3AreldEVGJ5aDJOdGdEbXlqQXRrY0RIMTdycE9Z?= =?utf-8?B?dWc2TjduMlJYcE9DRFkwZGh5K3YwclJmbllCR24yRmgwQUxNMWlsclZiUTkw?= =?utf-8?B?amJNRVdwVG81VVJ0R1ZJekhEZmZkaGU4Y29RcEJaNHQ1NmtFRDFtVzdyQmVR?= =?utf-8?B?eDc1M0N0dzhPWEpScGVKRXZHZDdieE4ybDhPV0xWZXNQUm5ZOEFKUWo5dkhi?= =?utf-8?B?TTh2em40WlZmak83aHQ1YkVHcURiaDI4V3JmZllyZSs2WndHUy9QbCttenV6?= =?utf-8?B?OXdJRU50SHBveDE5SU5QRnJiK0hWblVnL1oveVg0VlI1aFhzNzdrY0xMTm9l?= =?utf-8?B?SjE1TmltWnpGbnBPb21BY2d4WE5nc3R3akpvZXNqMm10bjROSzBSWHVJUGlN?= =?utf-8?B?RWRZNlZmN3ZLbWFBMFhvK0s3aHNudVBYMElzSHJoZUJOZ1ZsSFBnZWN0ZDRO?= =?utf-8?B?VUJBV0tSYnkyRmYxYUdpTDJNWHlISGlnNXNRdG5IWUxGMGU2ZDd4YVdHdXFr?= =?utf-8?B?TjNvL3RIazRJdDdYSnFPOUNLQWlhSGdWaXNBd1RYb0tPMDVoTi9KZFdWMXRU?= =?utf-8?B?T0hiL0VDaXdVZDRMRituMjdzb2dNbGthYkFoSFlNUzVzQldaSmxqanFRSE9m?= =?utf-8?B?ZEZ0azlGaWgyckllMFRoOWFwNXQ1WWRJbktiN0ZrdFFCUjJ2UXpMaXlaUW5O?= =?utf-8?B?R3VPMFpHei9TNUZNZ3ZWaUxwWFlOMDU3QmJpYmNaVUl5Q3hzQy84Sy8rRHQ2?= =?utf-8?B?UXJ4MStqRHkxaTRzbEo5Mkd3T2VKa3VaUGtnekNHQjBlMWFvQyszUXNNTWcr?= =?utf-8?B?Q1Q4MnBpRFgyNG9RYURMTkNkaDJTZlgwYVAyUG4wd2xPcndYWURJdnFZaXVj?= =?utf-8?B?dkNGQjNUUjNQOWRkSTYycS9aNFphOWlzTGRjR0N3OFNud1JWYmNBMUhtNDAv?= =?utf-8?B?a2xxQ0oxWDBzOGdkSkc5NzBHSWhhTDZGTm5vdXZMbndSSnlRTTkxRkphcEVH?= =?utf-8?B?RUpYVU1CYmRPSCt1WEZ3d0lPL0RDcVpxZ2V0c0RObUxBVGRwTVVGV0d2Mi9q?= =?utf-8?B?TTRyL0wrRXRUL2ZlV3d3SHlqNHkzS2hHTWRReHMrZU1vd0w3aHhCZzZOQnRG?= =?utf-8?B?UVhVcVlxOVlwNFRwUDlnUGJ1c0k5YkN5aTZGL1hMUk9Eby9WQ0ZIVzJhQnVE?= =?utf-8?B?dzMxQzRxQmprRHJEUUJ6SE5PbUZ0NlVTeTVkRHdUME1wMlIveGpoSTFzS05T?= =?utf-8?B?a0xkMG5Nd2pjNEY3L3NnRlFGZHp1N2xiVGoyZGhIMnJXS0ZjVC9tYjVzci8x?= =?utf-8?B?eC9rRndXTjNFZDdyaHp1d242MHBlQlR5VGtpZXd2eWNJUklQYjgyNFQ3UmdQ?= =?utf-8?B?TEx4TDQ4VkxrU1V3R0dXSXVYUWYvM2o1a25jbWhqWjhFczlYL2orUlkvL3JK?= =?utf-8?B?QysrOHk1UU9sTVBmaWJkd3k3WG05dTBya3A5bGdvR0RIVDhZRkV6VjJXajBz?= =?utf-8?B?cHNxNVUwNVBqRU5LSnBXQnkvWnkzd1pLeTRMSzZ2NFRIUlNnd1pZejBCQ0JP?= =?utf-8?B?MldBRlROKzFiZVkvMzVjT3oxYndzczhZYmp5VmZ0M0RUNElFS0c2TlB4Z3RF?= =?utf-8?B?blF4NW5GSzdyaHlSS1FSY2JQWDJpRzNrMlEvTWFQUXJjRUZzMzBBRndjNkhD?= =?utf-8?B?TjB4c2h4d1JzU05FN3lFSzNFSEZRQmlGQTZEME15SEt6ZGFGWnlRTngxZmVW?= =?utf-8?B?dmxTNlRidnQrT0lSOSs4Y21Cck0zOVF2UTRBcW5DZjdma0xLYzdvZFFIV0Y1?= =?utf-8?B?ZG5EdWoyVDd1ekI0bUdSaHl0SGZNMVNiaHllZXFheEY5cTZJNzUzQWZCZEJ3?= =?utf-8?B?cGRpVlVjTVpoRTF4QzRGWVp6L2xYaXo2cENyS3ZPcTc0ZUZpVWY2dkFxUkVt?= =?utf-8?Q?MpfnA3bb8P9glSk7lY?=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MW4PR02MB7394A437B39C21D8BCE8EDA1C6E69MW4PR02MB7394namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bf783758-abee-4503-7df1-08da18b5e9bb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Apr 2022 16:44:41.4934 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: e741d71c-c6b6-47b0-803c-0f3b32b07556
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: OI/pmXJCCcLmBY++YZ1oxftVp993iX8GAA5O7MTK3P0JP0YVcEyHijCYEJ6O9Yui
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR02MB5098
X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 351C45667AF53BBF1A3B2DBC375D6636B16E72D9E032673CFF42846E84A178D52
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: MMaC1vGYpUJbuyOeTwkuLv1I98z55vrc
X-Proofpoint-GUID: MMaC1vGYpUJbuyOeTwkuLv1I98z55vrc
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-04-07_03,2022-04-07_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204070083
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/8DSodXz74fXyROHSbqUD6FXCa_M>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:45:42 -0000

Comments In-Line..

Thanks,
            Jim Uttaro

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 12:05 PM
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Cc: rtg-ads@ietf.org; rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>rg>; RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps

Hi Linda,

APN would not need to be interconnected over an overlay network. The decision which underlay path to use could be still computed in run time and selection made by the application provided sufficient path diversity is exposed. Technically it could be realized by exposing two next hops on the same subnet app hosts sits on for each disjoined flow/session.

With v6 and multiple addresses things are much easier :)

Such diversity can be as simple as using at least two upstream ISPs and letting the application choose which way to fwd the packets. I am using such model myself for over two years and it works very well :).
[Jim U>] Many customers do just this..

Of course you could still go much more complex and do use form of OTT for the application endpoints too but I do not see this as a mandate.

Kind regards,
R.



On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 5:56 PM Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>> wrote:
Robert,

What you said is basically changing the naming convention:
“APN” is an overlay network that utilizes the information carried by the network protocols (IGP/BGP/etc.)  to intelligently forward application flows across the network.
Correct?

Linda

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 5:29 AM
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>>
Cc: rtg-ads@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-ads@ietf.org>; rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>>; RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps

All,

I believe that we should be very careful here.

Adding more application awareness to the network layer means more state more complexity and much higher network cost (both OPEX and CAPEX). It also means in vast majority of cases more overhead for packets.

The moment you cross network domain boundary it all breaks as this is purely unrealistic to synchronize how application A should be treated across N domains.

IMO we should actually go in complete opposite direction. Instead of loading networks with application awareness let application to choose end to end path by themselves which meet their requirements.

Keeping network primitive to allow basic IP forwarding while exposing different paths application packets may take will not only be much more scalable but will also allow application to adjust and tune its logic or buffering (which btw is already happening today anyway) to the actual needs.

Some of this exposure is already taking place today. But there is still room for improvement.

And let's keep it in mind that current networks both open as well as internal do struggle to offer end to end 8 classes of basic QoS.

Thinking that bunch of IETF drafts or RFCs will suddenly allow it to properly handle lot's of Application_IDs or Slice_IDs seems to me like a wish (at best).

Regards,
Robert


On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 7:15 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear RTGWG,


APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the
documents, including the scope of the problem and framework.  This topic needs
collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are
within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area.

RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of different options and one option for handling
such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG.
The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN.

We would like to solicit the WG for opinions.  Please note that comments about
existing APN documents should be sent to apn@ietf.org<mailto:apn@ietf.org>.  This thread focuses on
support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a
new WG.

Please send your comments, support, or objectiond.
Thanks!


Cheers,
Yingzhen  Jeff

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.ietf.org*2Fmailman*2Flistinfo*2Frtgwg&data=04*7C01*7Clinda.dunbar*40futurewei.com*7Ca86e02bf69d7438e623308da18817a25*7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc*7C1*7C1*7C637849241637165414*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C3000&sdata=OBTq2hTWBQPNwg3O*2FPTzz*2FG7MoLllJTtYgZSHJKPprI*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUl!!BhdT!k6GZ-kNQonAU3Fl9hQMs8ybOa6zBvHXLO73rR-BtELyLhRjEpi1KkkkQp6TcWbI-QiN1nxzo0Oo$>