Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 07 February 2018 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6135C124217; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 14:27:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.72.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151804247138.17167.1607920556154773860.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 14:27:51 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/ALH7S3dM2OV8HL70zjY72jDtmJM>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 22:27:51 -0000

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Same remark as in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model/ballot/#benoit-claise
The title should be: "YANG module for network instance"

This document is NMDA compliant. I should be clearly mentioned. Like in the RFC7223bis abstract.

No need to repeat the tree-diagram reference in:

   The NI model can be represented using the tree format defined in
   [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams] as:


Like for the LNE YANG module, you still have the -state in the example.