IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DC Routing requirements draft

Yi Yang <yyietf@gmail.com> Fri, 10 November 2017 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <yyietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97151294B2; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:25:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3K_aZMHppvrN; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:25:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x243.google.com (mail-yw0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C801294B3; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:25:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x243.google.com with SMTP id t71so9234025ywc.3; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:25:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ydjc/jF2opTiYFJqY4pNVRAtS7zuKybJmBSEdFSP0dI=; b=OX+AwhJeQOn9810y3Pc4aE2KgOLRQu0/ylrjOUfVKzmzoJV589o+Vf2wHWrZ8tWVgn RL1viATxQ5kLMWLgGDLpH502TlDvT7Yv+Xf90iZ9rwtqzpCs2zsrOA3gnNCc2v/dAjeP QM6bGYkKkF5O4T8q4zN0G80eFp9e/IT94cXaBPPnYLQF8wwGvK552fiIyoYxdkfb9NyL TSWsrGTAQuvfa7S1ar+2nVx3wpVQZds6+VXQPgssw63/xeuukRu2Kb9vCj8GD/kr9AG9 sBdX2zQT1t6fSbeeSXfo/zmaGgyuBq1u6sz4eU+vLE7uzx0D4C0K/4j7GqlksEZwIzyg UlHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ydjc/jF2opTiYFJqY4pNVRAtS7zuKybJmBSEdFSP0dI=; b=i3Nf5jVGcRN03XzGw20GsQNyn/Z7WYR+VNQDw3LWsYAOfhRPXCp8oMEX4lZhUGjROX DlTufn7CDeMqJ5veaySJ288mpm7Ssl4izCN4+ATg1uB9A6IiuNyxvJ08ep0wtP7lFtTj FhYfb9XBtutUnKEhDfTl05kkQ0pbaw+6Ns4us8Ms2aFfWf4l8G81aTaDEL7CJ4bYlLpy hsTEBDxvVFlBe6aEYfHUtOtr3BW1VJdU4eG9fyawnMR0Kj35n/ypIOW9GPaM3fMU04oe F+Lf1nk2A8ep1uJT5Kou82RF25XnASP75Z1X/rf73vWmJex4T/jBP/0pzuVl00UGAvwj qlTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7IXa7k+Ql4koe+/PG2FSqj7o+kQfFfShoo7W3snvVS12eLkLpS ggPCGbYPXPGy7i0YlBIzffY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbziuMg7eeJGvwHk5NRGufzkr9U1w5/tlbf7IdlAo3y0tosG+h/44eM51j1vYntZqr4/jr3qA==
X-Received: by 10.13.232.148 with SMTP id r142mr1221825ywe.223.1510349122301; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:25:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.56] (cpe-174-99-107-252.nc.res.rr.com. [174.99.107.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x68sm4888264ywg.65.2017.11.10.13.25.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:25:21 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: DC Routing requirements draft
From: Yi Yang <yyietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C6D0957-6C0B-453C-8547-6ED9347D3D8E@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:25:20 -0500
Cc: Dcrouting <dcrouting-bounces@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C3E3BD31-669A-4787-991A-879ED9284B27@gmail.com>
References: <5C6D0957-6C0B-453C-8547-6ED9347D3D8E@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/AeD8XX2UOIGrJv4ETPCXNTclvus>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 21:25:25 -0000

Hi Jeff,

This is probably obvious, but it might be worth to clarify — the convergence time requirement is for a single event, right?

Yi

> On Oct 30, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> We have just published DC Routing requirements draft (draft-dt-rtgwg-dcrouting-requirements) that is going to be presented at the upcoming BoF in Singapore.
> Please note that EDCO group (draft-elkins-routing-brickmortar-topology) input was not included and will have a separate track.
> 
> Your comments and suggestions are very welcome.
> 
> draft co-authors
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email