Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
strong <qinzhuangzhuang@chinaunicom.cn> Thu, 07 April 2022 02:54 UTC
Return-Path: <qinzhuangzhuang@chinaunicom.cn>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBD63A07E2;
Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.34
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 183KwvCScuHd; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sendg.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (sendg.mailex.chinaunicom.cn
[210.53.66.230])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FE93A07F6;
Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 0a000f34-b49ff70000001d7e-dd-624e52533a22
Received: from M10-HQ-MLCEN06.cnc.intra (Unknown_Domain [10.249.212.36])
by sendg.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id
F1.12.07550.3525E426; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:54:11 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from M10-XA-MLCEN04.MailSrv.cnc.intra (10.236.3.200) by
M10-HQ-MLCEN06.cnc.intra (10.249.212.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
15.0.1497.28; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:54:11 +0800
Received: from smtpbg.qq.com (10.236.27.12) by
M10-XA-MLCEN04.MailSrv.cnc.intra (10.236.3.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
15.0.1497.28; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:54:08 +0800
X-QQ-mid: Ytyyjxt-xx11d00t1649300046t80
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (unknown [10.14.123.13])
by smtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with
id ; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:54:05 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 0090000000000080B810000A0000000
X-QQ-GoodBg: 0
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.55.21102600
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:54:03 +0800
Subject: Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
From: strong <qinzhuangzhuang@chinaunicom.cn>
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>,
"rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <3BDC201B-EBC6-4D0B-B02E-5C5739A8921B@chinaunicom.cn>+F55A5E6392FED922
Thread-Topic: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
References: <204D8DE6-F51C-4551-B1D7-1D69DBCA3626@hxcore.ol>
In-Reply-To: <204D8DE6-F51C-4551-B1D7-1D69DBCA3626@hxcore.ol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3732173644_1478845272"
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: Ytyyjxt-xx:chinaunicom.cn:tyyjxt-xx:tyyjxt-xx11d002-yh12w
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXC9fOKim5wkF+Swf19EhYn5/xgtti/djGz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Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Ai7fYeScc-nb_6XL5EbuM-wQS9Q>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>,
<mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>,
<mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 02:54:25 -0000
Hi WGs, It’s great to have this focus WG for APN. We have tried some use cases, and we would like to do more under the APN framework. Thanks! Yours sincerely ZhuangZhuang 发件人: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> 代表 Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> 日期: 2022年4月6日 星期三 上午1:14 收件人: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>rg>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>rg>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org> 主题: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dear RTGWG, APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the documents, including the scope of the problem and framework. This topic needs collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area. RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of different options and one option for handling such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG. The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN. We would like to solicit the WG for opinions. Please note that comments about existing APN documents should be sent to apn@ietf.org<mailto:apn@ietf.org>. This thread focuses on support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a new WG. Please send your comments, support, or objectiond. Thanks! Cheers, Yingzhen Jeff 如果您错误接收了该邮件,请通过电子邮件立即通知我们。请回复邮件到 hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn,即可以退订此邮件。我们将立即将您的信息从我们的发送目录中删除。 If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by e-mail. Please reply to hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn ,you can unsubscribe from this mail. We will immediately remove your information from send catalogue of our.
- RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Jeff Tantsura
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Joel M. Halpern
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps hsyu
- 答复: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Feng Yang
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Gyan Mishra
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps liupengyjy@chinamobile.com
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Donald Eastlake
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps zhangs366@chinaunicom.cn
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Lin He
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps strong
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps 鱼亚锋
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Stefano Previdi IETF
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Robert Raszuk
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Linda Dunbar
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Linda Dunbar
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Robert Raszuk
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Giuseppe Fioccola
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps UTTARO, JAMES
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dhruv Dhody
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Luc-Fabrice Ndifor Ngwa [ MTN Cameroon ]
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps 庞冉(联通集团中国联通研究院-本 部)
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Adrian Farrel
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Luis M. Contreras
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Alexander Clemm
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Yichi Xu
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dirk Trossen
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps 贺鲲鹏
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Jeff Tantsura
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Liang Felix