Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 05 September 2018 16:36 UTC
Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA4A130E84 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rXKi2VgWcJvk for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0DDA130EB2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3607; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1536165383; x=1537374983; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7GivNIrjDQxw9hy60a6cWw5IF5jeOwUVxwNGadHfduM=; b=Npp6nNOhfJRbup4KfY1pjrVUdOjI3cAdep1+IxfK16BDKLQ5j17FLOTC uc/Bqw3Q8AE/6R8G3U3IYVpkQPMNEjnVA+t22BI5qL/tWcw73ncZKQ1CX k9Lgfa3M7JBLxJweS50NDCACXvrNkHy870OFnI+kTWzTIRE+bdVwvWjJm 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B0AQBCBJBb/xbLJq1aGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYQzbRIog3KIcY0yLZYvFIFmCxgNhEcCg3E1FwECAQECAQECbRwMhTcBAQEBAgEBASEVNhAHBAsSAwECAgImAgInIg4GAQwGAgEBgx0BgXkID6JogS6EbIUbgQuJZIFBP4ESJ4JrgxsBAQIBARaBDIM8glcCjXKNagmGNoV+g0QGF4FAICiDc4JXhhCLL4JTgx6CVIFDAjSBVTMaCBsVGiGCbAmLDIU/PjABjgABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,334,1531785600"; d="scan'208";a="6300142"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2018 16:36:21 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.158] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com [10.63.23.158]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w85GaK0p004508; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 16:36:21 GMT
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <153513080167.23068.13986732289959388709@ietfa.amsl.com> <9b09507f-aec3-eae1-cc40-823125bbb00a@cisco.com> <007301d4414c$0ddd16a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <49d4fe3e-24c7-af28-f508-cfed2707af1d@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 17:36:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <007301d4414c$0ddd16a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.63.23.158, dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/AvOUlx1za-WEuzzohyvV17tBgAk>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 16:36:42 -0000
Tom, Thanks for these comments, we will also address these in the next version. On 31/08/2018 17:59, tom petch wrote: > Rob > > Good to see my comments addressed. > > While you are at it > > - YANG module copyright is 2016 which will get fixed but makes me notice > .... > > - Security Considerations is not the current template; should have > Normative References to SSH and TLS > > - s5.1 has > draft [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis]). > which is now an RFC > > - IANA Considerations references RFC7950. As I learnt lately, RFC6020 > is better here as all RFC7950 does is point you to RFC6020 > > - > "MAC address in the format of H-H-H, in which H is a > hexadecimal number of 1 to 4 bits."; > > If H has a maximum of 4 bits, then you have a 12 bit address, not quite > the MAC I see these days! Ah, yes, it was probably meant to say digits. > I wonder if it is better to leave this out > and let readers refer to RFC6991. Quite probably, it seems generally better if things are only defined in one place. Thanks, Rob > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Wilton" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> > To: <rtgwg@ietf.org> > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 6:17 PM > >> The -01 version fixes some of the comments raised during WG adoption, >> but further work is in progress to improve the language, so expect a >> properly updated version before the IETF 103. >> >> Thanks, >> Rob >> >> On 24/08/2018 18:13, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of > the IETF. >>> Title : YANG Data Model for ARP >>> Authors : Feng Zheng >>> Bo Wu >>> Robert Wilton >>> Xiaojian Ding >>> Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt >>> Pages : 17 >>> Date : 2018-08-24 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> This document defines a YANG data model for the management of > the >>> Address Resolution Protocol (ARP). It extends the basic ARP >>> functionality contained in the ietf-ip YANG data model, defined > in >>> RFC 8344, to provide management of optional ARP features and >>> statistics. >>> >>> The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network >>> Management Datastore Architecture defined in RFC 8342. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model/ >>> >>> There are also htmlized versions available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01 >>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01 >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission >>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rtgwg mailing list >>> rtgwg@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >>> . >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> rtgwg mailing list >> rtgwg@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > . >
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt internet-drafts
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-0… Robert Wilton
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-0… tom petch
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-0… Robert Wilton