Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 05 September 2018 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA4A130E84 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rXKi2VgWcJvk for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0DDA130EB2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3607; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1536165383; x=1537374983; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7GivNIrjDQxw9hy60a6cWw5IF5jeOwUVxwNGadHfduM=; b=Npp6nNOhfJRbup4KfY1pjrVUdOjI3cAdep1+IxfK16BDKLQ5j17FLOTC uc/Bqw3Q8AE/6R8G3U3IYVpkQPMNEjnVA+t22BI5qL/tWcw73ncZKQ1CX k9Lgfa3M7JBLxJweS50NDCACXvrNkHy870OFnI+kTWzTIRE+bdVwvWjJm 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B0AQBCBJBb/xbLJq1aGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYQzbRIog3KIcY0yLZYvFIFmCxgNhEcCg3E1FwECAQECAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?CbRwMhTcBAQEBAgEBASEVNhAHBAsSAwECAgImAgInIg4GAQwGAgEBgx0BgXk?= =?us-ascii?q?ID6JogS6EbIUbgQuJZIFBP4ESJ4JrgxsBAQIBARaBDIM8glcCjXKNagmGNoV?= =?us-ascii?q?+g0QGF4FAICiDc4JXhhCLL4JTgx6CVIFDAjSBVTMaCBsVGiGCbAmLDIU/PjA?= =?us-ascii?q?BjgABAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,334,1531785600"; d="scan'208";a="6300142"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2018 16:36:21 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.158] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com [10.63.23.158]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w85GaK0p004508; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 16:36:21 GMT
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <153513080167.23068.13986732289959388709@ietfa.amsl.com> <9b09507f-aec3-eae1-cc40-823125bbb00a@cisco.com> <007301d4414c$0ddd16a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <49d4fe3e-24c7-af28-f508-cfed2707af1d@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:36:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <007301d4414c$0ddd16a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.63.23.158, dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/AvOUlx1za-WEuzzohyvV17tBgAk>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 16:36:42 -0000

Tom,

Thanks for these comments, we will also address these in the next version.

On 31/08/2018 17:59, tom petch wrote:
> Rob
>
> Good to see my comments addressed.
>
> While you are at it
>
> - YANG module copyright is 2016 which will get fixed but makes me notice
> ....
>
> - Security Considerations is not the current template; should have
> Normative References to SSH and TLS
>
> - s5.1 has
> draft [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis]).
> which is now an RFC
>
> - IANA Considerations references RFC7950.  As I learnt lately, RFC6020
> is better here as all RFC7950 does is point you to RFC6020
>
> -
> "MAC address in the format of H-H-H, in which H is a
>   hexadecimal number of 1 to 4 bits.";
>
> If H has a maximum of 4 bits, then you have a 12 bit address, not quite
> the MAC I see these days!
Ah, yes, it was probably meant to say digits.

>   I wonder if it is better to leave this out
> and let readers refer to RFC6991.
Quite probably, it seems generally better if things are only defined in 
one place.

Thanks,
Rob


>
> Tom Petch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Wilton" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>;
> To: <rtgwg@ietf.org>;
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 6:17 PM
>
>> The -01 version fixes some of the comments raised during WG adoption,
>> but further work is in progress to improve the language, so expect a
>> properly updated version before the IETF 103.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rob
>>
>> On 24/08/2018 18:13, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of
> the IETF.
>>>           Title           : YANG Data Model for ARP
>>>           Authors         : Feng Zheng
>>>                             Bo Wu
>>>                             Robert Wilton
>>>                             Xiaojian Ding
>>> Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
>>> Pages           : 17
>>> Date            : 2018-08-24
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>      This document defines a YANG data model for the management of
> the
>>>      Address Resolution Protocol (ARP).  It extends the basic ARP
>>>      functionality contained in the ietf-ip YANG data model, defined
> in
>>>      RFC 8344, to provide management of optional ARP features and
>>>      statistics.
>>>
>>>      The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
>>>      Management Datastore Architecture defined in RFC 8342.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model/
>>>
>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
>>>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtgwg mailing list
>>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>>> .
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtgwg mailing list
>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> .
>