IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 01 December 2018 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B5812F1AC; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 03:55:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qw50KglOXJ9U; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 03:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4ABB12F1A5; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 03:55:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9526; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1543665305; x=1544874905; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=r9XEIbLWgqFUNUUHMBiiYyiib9jOGqZ5+qIONK+J6cQ=; b=P9v3qqYjp8iPf062QwOQmaX9BGcg6l4B83ubgxe+5tpp4Hib8NYB7+dN dBebWyCSXx5+0QxFRAYUeBGBhX5UkiquEBAMTzh3ArrW20PM44w9B2L+S 8xepj9wTCNe/xt5CD5DartrBDgCzNQWHkQ8kvBEn6RuuXcRCa/f6bA+ph Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAACodQJc/5ldJa1jGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDXZmgQInCoNviBiMC4FoJYkRiGGFVhSBZgsBAYRsAheDHSI0CQ0BAwEBAgEBAm0ohTwBAQEEI0sGBRACAQgRAwECKwICAh8RHQgCBAENBYMhAYEdTAMVpVmBL4VAgkANghyMHBeBf4E4DBOCTIJXgXIFARIBP4JkMYImAo8VkHsuCQKODIMuEgaBW4URijiJA4VwiVECERSBJx84ZHFwFTsqAYJBkFtBMYt9gR+BHwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,302,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="493328244"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Dec 2018 11:55:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wB1Bt1BN014596 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 1 Dec 2018 11:55:03 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 06:55:00 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 06:55:00 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07
Thread-Index: AQHUiR309TIp0lWDbE2uzFCStQw86qVpxyMA
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 11:55:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E575FB53-270A-4286-AB06-A688DBF665DD@cisco.com>
References: <5e6b8c2a-bbc0-4390-b8d8-358477757cf6@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <5e6b8c2a-bbc0-4390-b8d8-358477757cf6@Spark>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E575FB53270A4286AB06A688DBF665DDciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.152, xch-rtp-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/BxpbefUuvLbivkYLIYpKwd-Y5kQ>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 11:55:09 -0000

I support WG adoption of this YANG model.
Acee

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 at 9:31 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Cc: Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested RTGWG to adopt draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model as the working group document.
The draft has received support during IETF101 meeting, authors have addressed all the comments received.

Please indicate support or no-support by December 15, 2018.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
author and each individual that has contributed to the document..

Cheers,
Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email