I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 15 June 2015 12:04 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD23F1B2C13; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLHH4IOZLFO3; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C481B2C12; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.3.p3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150615120359.13414.61321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:03:59 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/DIXAvVjR-l5s2NH0wknoNOqn0r4>
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:04:03 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. Title : Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability Authors : Pushpasis Sarkar Hannes Gredler Shraddha Hegde Chris Bowers Stephane Litkowski Harish Raghuveer Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02.txt Pages : 16 Date : 2015-06-15 Abstract: The loop-free alternates computed following the current Remote-LFA [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa] specification gaurantees only link- protection. The resulting Remote-LFA nexthops (also called PQ- nodes), may not gaurantee node-protection for all destinations being protected by it. This document describes procedures for determining if a given PQ-node provides node-protection for a specific destination or not. The document also shows how the same procedure can be utilised for collection of complete characteristics for alternate paths. Knowledge about the characteristics of all alternate path is precursory to apply operator defined policy for eliminating paths not fitting constraints. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection… internet-drafts
- Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protec… Pushpasis Sarkar