AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-05
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 17 January 2018 18:53 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4087512E04D; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:53:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bUk8OLIo7DRS; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D68012D7E2; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id y141so13886519oia.0; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:53:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3OgirCqdRJvkUXUZkapddAnMzsHEP2YXkmAN1dgbExE=; b=aXxEAteEU2HRmgn8oosHHaFr/FRi5k4oLNz6RtFW4IBKXYI2+n8XqHEjRJiCnuVhAs dHXrEYAN4grbbFMvtnWKGr+8uiZwm1/kvYB4JAYhWgFa5wvALZuTYG15EvjR0muT5wWy /MXY9xrYFQRngUh9MoAwNgmElX75JApHBgptO+4DKF7qFc+OPmzXF/mu1uyfNtyIORfS 7yehLIUDGWU/XjAdaOazhuQWfsOw8efwWLsmAs91vv8xo9sdk/1gP1KjUoHCafVppPxY PrtQKgQCK73nHpned6VIra105pZ2hKkjvAMFs6FvhRP98IoUAKm9C7aYuc77a0q+6yNK Ji9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3OgirCqdRJvkUXUZkapddAnMzsHEP2YXkmAN1dgbExE=; b=SINtGCQN/bcQO+CLWZShOaK24oR+aeZa3nKJVahqNw1SY+jOvJlRey04U+3kARtCH6 BXOU7D9dH/gKHJqmh+ttNtLVvwMJH2BXd93as5OMB+JGjKtBpfg86rc+jln4WPSAiIOf tKyftSsAiz+k2Xd0sXU/J4PSy6cFTQ7zZSD7R6N07QdqhbA/41hOAPwTO7ql3SeAWhjl Ja5oUrEYJsTXj11zu3X81164T5zXpUVg2OFl4mIkVWGaikg9NvF+3aouEHVeyRTWsWl9 b6UBM9Zmtpx+GJ4ZWt4NW9sqjKil55GILYjmEiJ1svjBxiGSnoNQX2QWFPXfFMUTyakZ x/ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcoDgzdlNNRryjXvaOMjDCW1QUyFYPYmz9vr1hcDH03LLKWwfK+ vIOJirf+fXfhg9mD4Xb8+Ak9COB23/E5fbYPs1uL1YM5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoudNN+CKKmWTQ/LxNYIHmkFjrilYqNBS38C8UorVYaxY/5s4qZu58JIFv9Q5wXmFW0UZXGjdc8Zo3TkX+g8JwU=
X-Received: by 10.202.48.76 with SMTP id w73mr1553034oiw.185.1516215181853; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:53:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.67.47 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:53:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:53:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rdEDROhRNMWkdcWJh9FSTkSSb6qL8aVksCuKwOuQotnNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-05
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cdf4c514b090562fd5b62"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Dgl8duxDAFHbeGdthk_K4QiZRHs>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:53:04 -0000
As is customary, I have done my AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-05. First, I would like to thank the authors - Lou, Chris, Acee, Dean, and Xufeng - as well as those who have reviewed the draft for their work on this document. I do have a few minor comments - around updating the model and examples to be NMDA compliant. I will issue and IETF Last Call and schedule this for the Feb 8 telechat. Minor: 1) RFC 7223 references should be to 7223bis 2) Example in B.1 uses routing and routing-state and interfaces and interfaces-state as per pre-NMDA - but updated draft is approved as RFC - so should move to NMDA example. Thanks, Alia
- AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-05 Alia Atlas