Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-03.txt

"Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <bashandy@cisco.com> Wed, 28 March 2018 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <bashandy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15C91289B0 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: DNS error: SERVFAIL)" header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2PJUuOPJk0js for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A931112895E for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9595; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1522278760; x=1523488360; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=jaQyJWAd0mxOULqk3LLx1f+o3DaHoQHcBnnwwBsx8CQ=; b=hG9piC1BInYq8UVlY+vYOuPjgRr8ORZJOy8xyXADF5g9t5WRtN8Ygbc+ Ku9q8qEVDuRQgiEU5MEMxeMJulYerMyioLe8INTDmynxgZqOMxsbnMzhV OIzqfuKnIFmPNdJJGGetBh6lwrMF3yFB9bSy1zTHBMyV6O5Gzr9RwZE9b Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,373,1517875200"; d="scan'208,217";a="372044733"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Mar 2018 23:12:40 +0000
Received: from [10.154.131.3] ([10.154.131.3]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2SNCdlc024033; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:12:39 GMT
Subject: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-03.txt
References: <152224651428.29840.3923698776319893169@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
From: "Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <bashandy@cisco.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <152224651428.29840.3923698776319893169@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <7497f49c-43f4-b095-5430-e1a53830b88d@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:12:39 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <152224651428.29840.3923698776319893169@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------DADF8EEA9E02912AF773B664"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/EZk4HWOxQKv6JChAmO7WzN6p0So>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:12:43 -0000

Hi

This is a new version of the Ti-lfa draft. The key changes are:
- Added a section 6 that provides statistics on the number of SIDs 
needed to protect against link, node, and local SRLG
- Defined the term "topology independent"
- Confirmed near the beginning of Section 3 that the mechanisms in the 
document are applicable whether downstream routers have converged or 
not, thereby alleviating any need for co-ordination or message exchange 
between the PLR and any other router in the network
- At the end of Section 5, we added paragraphs to explain how a PLR is 
able to protect SR-policies by inspecting the SID right after the active 
SID and determining the correct action accordingly
- Addressed comments that were sent out on the rtgwg mailing list. If 
there is anything that is overlooked, we are more than happy to address 
and/or correct.


All comments are most welcomed

Ahmed


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	I-D Action: draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-03.txt
Date: 	Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:15:14 -0700
From: 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
Reply-To: 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: 	i-d-announce@ietf.org



A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


         Title           : Topology Independent Fast Reroute using Segment Routing
         Authors         : Ahmed Bashandy
                           Clarence Filsfils
                           Bruno Decraene
                           Stephane Litkowski
                           Pierre Francois
                           Daniel Voyer
	Filename        : draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-03.txt
	Pages           : 18
	Date            : 2018-03-28

Abstract:
    This document presents Topology Independent Loop-free Alternate Fast
    Re-route (TI-LFA), aimed at providing protection of node and
    adjacency segments within the Segment Routing (SR) framework.  This
    Fast Re-route (FRR) behavior builds on proven IP-FRR concepts being
    LFAs, remote LFAs (RLFA), and remote LFAs with directed forwarding
    (DLFA).  It extends these concepts to provide guaranteed coverage in
    any IGP network.  A key aspect of TI-LFA is the FRR path selection
    approach establishing protection over post-convergence paths from
    the point of local repair, dramatically reducing the operational
    need to control the tie-breaks among various FRR options.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-03


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt