IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 24 January 2018 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF69B12D810; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:27:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eXcDvVqC5PGN; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x233.google.com (mail-pg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8348412D7F9; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y27so3816312pgc.5; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:27:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ZX/Gj/B93D8AvSB7XQyWUMTDLRjKpjG3fqvmy0utKDs=; b=Cn+w6/5VkNQHB/hRLAcPuhY2bdK5fJI7R2SgHVCi1T4DJ406M+dNVidj308JjsWAT7 gxMzMojsQiaT8dTiUdXSpbFvey4aMlXoD/4OhEVZDH2/UPWaid0yml40+zIm3uKuHjU+ OWjVSy80PMmp5aKTFpRcmr4TkNhAxs+G7UUr6RlTU+EKFxqcv/Z0OTD4aQtAOcmxsPdj 1X8LOSirLZ198VgAlCMtz9YNsyOjw6oOiBiOyssHIYd1DKtLz94EdY+BOC9dRW8AnOYs cEgfQBLj2WEeodqvPAn++2sAZ+5jpOTI3ZoIO3wxtAnH5ryGsQrocgtVCaovXVYJlaJT HXgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ZX/Gj/B93D8AvSB7XQyWUMTDLRjKpjG3fqvmy0utKDs=; b=gb75SxVzpc5b9phnWj+g6PFCm6LJPUXShPwfMuI6TgB6y/phHB/O+YOsx1YTXeUvQU j6YO2IQpaoYrqh2US6b+SmxvkC7nmw1DU9X2bb2Eyocy6NiYw/kT0KVPIhfyRXUKVWk8 rXxndMkoJNgRfQEKAYfICHqXoJW9xsqBu+aziCQq436oUbPBSb0H6SXsY6Ru0MVa20qS +SmNRn0hVC3kmKaRjKZk0E47Q88frvDAtfSv31ts95ELfVcgqZ77DAPT6a7Nhoit4HX9 hTp8bUynTr5B3d2rrHRe9ZBRRiEachHHmpcubXawzxWsdClimzj4FrKauZDybmIpMA8T j8JA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytexcKRUas1pYD96aex0TrkBK7U/ZnzsisZo301bbLcMzQGXHvuv /Odywp/ByN3ADD0Y2XqQ7p8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224dhcSxA+g4tQaOaN/f4jN5aR04SD31LOqpeqHUiQRBRbo5cqwFY2TTp9fmD0kAKWi2rBlpfA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:24a2:: with SMTP id w31-v6mr8348387pla.262.1516836458971; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:27:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.178.80.45] ([192.55.54.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14sm5409719pfi.132.2018.01.24.15.27.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:27:38 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:27:37 -0800
Subject: Re: early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, isis-wg@ietf.org, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
CC: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <B88BAC8E-4642-4E39-82E0-D4FBA90DD76A@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG
References: <CAG4d1rf1njJF0vpt8tQ3vQUTBC4T+_ZJw=2DGHViSqW6pfvMjg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rf1njJF0vpt8tQ3vQUTBC4T+_ZJw=2DGHViSqW6pfvMjg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3599652458_2036382458"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/F1rzeyHpVkVot5y_xOQqMUErZXU>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:27:42 -0000

Hi Alia,

 

+1 on keeping FRR work in RTGWG ;-)

 

Cheers,

Jeff

 

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 09:22
To: <isis-wg@ietf.org>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG

 

I am working on the initial charter for the LSR WG, which will combine the 

OSPF and ISIS WGs.  At this time, I do not see moving the fast-reroute work

from RTGWG, but I am willing to hear opinions.

 

In general, feedback on what areas should be the initial focus or specific 

concerns on scoping would be useful.  My basic plan is for a broad charter focused

on maintenance, usage scenarios, and extensions - much as OSPF and ISIS are

chartered today.

 

I would like to have this on the February 8 IESG telechat, so rapid feedback and reviews

of the proposed charter when it is sent out would be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Alia

_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email