Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model
Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@futurewei.com> Thu, 03 September 2020 22:32 UTC
Return-Path: <yingzhen.qu@futurewei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39D43A10B1; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=futurewei.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TPVdFwmKkLAR; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10on2124.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.93.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A00283A108D; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=T2cDVs/1Y+2wHYXyS9l0FvuFLVhmOpM5VOX7TDf7NPxeWx5QPIVTHI7SK35it9FNYheKaF1m5RfZE92Jw0CDn0e7W3TupTzp8AQyeI08e+JPrbEahIuqBrCX6LvVtoabAQ65rIRQrBWVa3A1fPXZVK3BnJ9k2wDXGW9v5bRz0JKiWALCO5I2UQTc136iXD8xoKjycBjRgYpJoLJEQbfR2rBMZZQVnAd4/s6uibMCyoprOJ5RDD0CWWwKuUXtnHDu2HW3ze9fToLN4flsnGzKmWv8DeiLDqjNl3GDg6W48S/NR0X8M0YhlM10F3cjNrBE4iQxWibNbmgKm0th06jUbg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DypJhf8O5SZps9pqZq6YUb/Q1WsknskORtaZb3bSQbY=; b=By+M6MCaEr35HN5r8W9F65Aqy33JHxuiOm5EoU00WQP929jpN8wld3V3V109Opv5bNql6ErSyb2PWfJ1CNZVoq72hhtTjM2ItS3VRPHADrp7Iu+wtT9Edj8dBX596Za6g5rnNa/fTaEd2jn/k+hXwYwFF2Xk4wI8q5pBVsxF7tL2aA/aif/UizUcueRfn5r24CfdPHNjWklSTmOkWzgmJcW24D/WreBdbSAjwY5CGOrKDheEFTheIwGhd/ZRgdqVNpbjX2V+dQsGOQpdgx08NWpEPwFPX7Uncc+8wUDyrN1sWhTYoDopf5WUY5nFvkCbEaCrU7GgK8Md0baKNnpj/Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Futurewei.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DypJhf8O5SZps9pqZq6YUb/Q1WsknskORtaZb3bSQbY=; b=RJH1v69LqYV1DBg/DV1btDYpWJCPDWUDAwVetmXYRJUyNSuUGfkS07yHoUiXDFHvaFa7dSPZFkLQWSFQJFTjKV/Boh2gblhI+ciQFnIKNbPW8etEa0tMXu0qXcGCIrGMM9BHvpcSG34kpQamvH5eOdGSs6vprNwh4KGZ+NbhMmk=
Received: from BY5PR13MB3048.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:188::21) by BYAPR13MB2679.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:b5::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.7; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:31:59 +0000
Received: from BY5PR13MB3048.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::381e:6640:d3a3:5034]) by BY5PR13MB3048.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::381e:6640:d3a3:5034%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3370.010; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:31:59 +0000
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@futurewei.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model
Thread-Topic: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model
Thread-Index: AQHWdOBgm2u0PEmAtk+61ZlQgMjXjalXfeEAgAAAZAD//6a0gA==
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 22:31:59 +0000
Message-ID: <0DE4BE44-3AB4-4119-B2DE-E892581F0C40@futurewei.com>
References: <CAHzoHbu7g7VifCVf4hEuvNkf46+3AG8_A6JhJdKQ5y2WN1njQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHzoHbtCvr+9pALnTeV_SQ8fGzebrvHBJ0014Kpxkspd4G+n-A@mail.gmail.com> <0F803BA7-FC74-4942-A141-6838F84C3D80@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F803BA7-FC74-4942-A141-6838F84C3D80@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.40.20081000
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=futurewei.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:646:9500:c900:95ce:59b:6ce5:51d4]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bd46c4fd-ba42-49c4-98ef-08d850592c33
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR13MB2679:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR13MB2679C4B50DCF3E7A04160E93E12C0@BYAPR13MB2679.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ZQ4fDPbKjInJdy6Grek150GUCPLiia/Zm2akIZrgr8FmX/3nQ7QC0np+NqNvE17lk3+/gz3q9pJixsTXY/n0P9YHXO8pH9afRB7tVf1dPADNawli3KgbPnrD3MCwcMawcV9NKYhznwfrc6t9dJko+WKWKWgx25/XSemuKZXvTCtQ7A5FapSvbM+QcA1mrydNgV/rNu2lE3tiu3gAbdb5sbpZ9RIYE1nEVjHQzShHjJQI8xKv/FcWRq39KS34QPteiDUZwaDS2fooYqi3mbsUuDEYej8JYIiPD9kAWz512dRdeQ72R6lFOi8yW9xzsm9Z24N+3Nr6LrxpAvDmLLJzNg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR13MB3048.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(39850400004)(136003)(366004)(346002)(376002)(5660300002)(66946007)(71200400001)(33656002)(110136005)(76116006)(66476007)(2616005)(53546011)(66556008)(186003)(66446008)(36756003)(44832011)(8936002)(316002)(86362001)(64756008)(6512007)(6506007)(2906002)(9326002)(83380400001)(8676002)(478600001)(6486002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0DE4BE443AB44119B2DEE892581F0C40futureweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR13MB3048.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bd46c4fd-ba42-49c4-98ef-08d850592c33
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Sep 2020 22:31:59.5466 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0fee8ff2-a3b2-4018-9c75-3a1d5591fedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jpuoIMBbIm2jz2CbzcEBtKz7PQ2v7Xb4Nkj7WcMi2NrZowH25I9TSh1Fjl/Mo076n530zjQ1S10K4c4URwt7tg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR13MB2679
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/FtKl-usxal3kD7OnB2LhRhuPA5Y>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 22:32:04 -0000
Hi Chris, Thank you for your suggestion, really appreciate. Version -21 has been uploaded with added text as you suggested. Please let us know if you have any other comments. Thanks, Yingzhen From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 1:52 PM To: Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org> Subject: Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Resent-From: <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com> Hi Chris, I agree and will make the changes tomorrow. Thanks, Acee From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 4:50 PM To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org> Subject: Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model RTGWG, An objection has been raised with respect to requesting publication of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model at this time. The main concern expressed is that changes in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model may require changes in draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model. The main area of concern is the text in section 7 of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model, which illustrates how the current version of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model augments rpol:defined-sets, rpol:conditions, and rpol:actions with bp:bgp-defined-sets, bp:bgp-conditions, and bp:bgp-actions. I would like to suggest adding the following text to section 7 to make it clear that this text is not normative. ================= The example below provides an illustration of how another data model can augment parts of this routing policy data model. It uses specific examples from draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09 to show in a concrete manner how the different pieces fit together. This example is not normative with respect to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model. ================= Would this text, or something similar, help to address this concern? Thanks, Chris On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:45 PM Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote: RTGWG, This email starts the two week WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model. Please indicate support for, or opposition to, the publication of this document as Proposed Standard, along with the reasoning behind that support or opposition. Jeff Tantsura is a co-author of the document, so he won't be involved in judging consensus. IPR: If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. This WG last call will end on September 2, 2020. Thanks, Chris
- WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Chris Bowers
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Yingzhen Qu
- RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Qin Wu
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Xufeng Liu
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Chris Bowers
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Yingzhen Qu
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Chris Bowers
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-mode… tom petch
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-mode… Yingzhen Qu