Re: VLSM Tree Routing Protocol and others

Has it been implemented and then deployed? Has it been proven to work?

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, 17:29 shyam bandyopadhyay, <shyamb66@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Adrian,
>
> I would like to appeal once again to consider the following drafts
> to be published under the Independent Submission stream.
>
> 1. draft-shyam-vlsmtrp: This is a routing protocol applicable inside a
> provider network where it
> appears to be in the form of a tree and distribution of address space
> takes place with the approach of
> VLSM. It covers routing as well as all related aspects that are required
> as a substitute of BGP inside VLSM tree.
>
> 2. draft-shyam-hipi: This is a protocol to identify hosts uniquely with
> provider independent addresses
> where customers' networks are connected to more than one service
> provider. It is based on the
> approach of DNS and can be considered as an alternative to HIP.
>
> 3. draft-shyam-site-multi: It provides a solution for site multihoming of
> stub networks.
> This is based on the principle of "default routing based on the
> source domain of the source address of the outgoing traffic". Out of all
> the possible paths between source and destination, it goes through the
> path selection criterion on end to end basis. It provides a mechanism to
> switch over to an alternate route on link failure.
>
> As I had said earlier, draft-shyam-site-multi, draft-shyam-hipi and
> draft-shyam-vlsmtrp
> has got reference to draft-shyam-real-ip-framework which is a proposed
> framework that can
> be considered for the ease of routing and for the convenience of
> distribution.But, they can exist on their own irrespective of the framework
> supported. draft-shyam-vlsmtrp and draft-shyam-hipi expects distribution of
> address space the way it appears in draft-shyam-real-ip-framework.
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>