Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps

Dear RTGWG

After the BOF and many rounds of review of APN, we  have from each round
have clarified the scope of APN as well as resolution of all outstanding
issues from the BOF.  Any outstanding issues not closed out that still
exist, we would like to openly address and make part of the defined
deliverables.

We would like to continue the work as we have received positive feedback
and interest from the IETF community.

Many thanks to the RTGWG to provide a venue for APN for discussions.

As the APN work spans beyond the RTGWG charter to 6MAN, SPRING, BESS, IDR,
PCE  and possibly other WGs, I support the chairs recommendations on
forming a limited lifetime Focus WG for APN work with a set of defined
deliverables and milestones.

We would like to work with the RTGWG WG to solicit feedback on APN  in
building the set of defined deliverables and milestones.

Thank you

Gyan

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:45 AM Feng Yang <yangfeng@chinamobile.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> After so many rounds of clarifications and a lot of work, now APN has a
> very clear scope as well as problem statement. We also have an use case
> draft of APN.
>
> We support the suggestion to have this APN focused WG and we would like to
> join the work on the APN framework.
>
>
>
> BR，
>
> Feng Yang
>
>
>
> *发件人:* rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] *代表 *Jeff Tantsura
> *发送时间:* 2022年4月6日 01:15
> *收件人:* RTGWG; rtgwg-chairs; rtg-ads@ietf.org
> *主题:* RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
>
>
>
> Dear RTGWG,
>
>
>
>
>
> APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution
> of the
>
> documents, including the scope of the problem and framework.  This topic
> needs
>
> collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be
> addressed are
>
> within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area.
>
>
>
> RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of
> different options and one option for handling
>
> such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG.
>
> The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a
> focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after
> delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN.
>
>
>
> We would like to solicit the WG for opinions.  Please note that comments
> about
>
> existing APN documents should be sent to apn@ietf.org.  This thread
> focuses on
>
> support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation
> of a
>
> new WG.
>
>
>
> Please send your comments, support, or objectiond.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Yingzhen  Jeff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*

*M 301 502-1347*