Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model

Yingzhen Qu <> Thu, 21 December 2017 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A3F12D7E2; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:37:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id diuk4RRfVDGq; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F9A1275FD; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B1ABEBDB4D85A; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:37:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:37:24 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:37:19 -0800
From: Yingzhen Qu <>
To: Jeff Tantsura <>, RTGWG <>
CC: Rtg-dt-yang-arch <>, 'rtgwg-chairs' <>
Subject: Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model
Thread-Topic: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model
Thread-Index: AQHTTERfyjQmEZlODkaUPKC+bydrXKMsOJ4AgCL8tIA=
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:37:18 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:37:28 -0000

Hi all,

The authors have addressed all shepherd comments and updated the draft, it’s ready to be submitted to the IESG.


On 11/29/17, 7:20 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Jeff Tantsura" < on behalf of>; wrote:

    Dear RTGWG,
    The WGLC has been concluded, after the authors will have shepherd comments addressed the draft will be submitted to the IESG.  
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jeff Tantsura <>;
    Date: Monday, October 23, 2017 at 14:17
    To: RTGWG <>;
    Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs' <>;, Benoit Claise <>;, Rtg-dt-yang-arch <>;
    Subject: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model
        Dear RTGWG,
        The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model
        The interdependencies related to draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount have been addressed.
        There was consensus that document is ready for the last call during the last IETF meeting 
        and the authors have addressed all the comments from Directorate QA review and YANGDOCTORS.
        Please indicate support or no-support by November 6, 2017.
        If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this 
        email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. 
        The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
        The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been 
        received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
        Jeff & Chris
    rtgwg mailing list