IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> Tue, 04 December 2018 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CE9130EC1; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 03:09:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.739
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME=2.95, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l1xQCg40Mb1T; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 03:09:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01on0717.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe1f::717]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC32C130EAC; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 03:09:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7yhr5OWoRfutzuWRl/faRB2zJisToAArmaoFaSwOPBk=; b=kOwkGB4KgEYH5nGLjBL0A/3z6znUEwOBTrLzoqHRPkkuj5OKBalUXLqtANoNzumqsGxJXX1rCCpUxwkZASzV3rhF4w6Qu9o9lUgxX3oA5TCpE3ssP8YQGlSBRYsHVHPGYRic2iQ4dYjs+X8Zov/fF60OsCH2Xqa1nEyz7V2sJyY=
Received: from AM0PR07MB4484.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.135.151.13) by AM0PR07MB4180.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.133.59.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1404.13; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:09:18 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB4484.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::64c9:6370:2e12:3bfa]) by AM0PR07MB4484.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::64c9:6370:2e12:3bfa%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1404.016; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:09:18 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07
Thread-Index: AQHUi8HM8fp2tIzuPkGNuQexk1cC7g==
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 11:09:18 +0000
Message-ID: <036a01d48bc1$7abc5960$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <5e6b8c2a-bbc0-4390-b8d8-358477757cf6@Spark>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: LO2P123CA0024.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:a6::36) To AM0PR07MB4484.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:78::13)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [86.139.215.184]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM0PR07MB4180; 6:/O83XUvKFjyNnY9FGcV9Cj/S5//7QZcxe7P/EJVvfyQI2cYRPaptmYp45E0uL+xAMjq11ZiMaxUiz4uSV4Z9Iapswjc1RJw3t4EES0U/MBq4EAeNGnx8NV3wKMlZe2nvKxrI7n26prO57vWnU7/BWDrBTflCg4kGNuWv56o4lPt387c8W1rX7K9qPaBgp4V2UaYOzsLiiOOy94A+WfUFdNLTAudvKnX+Jxi/D4yufNJGjmvwy/Av78zrONpi620jej7mHfPkjSUPtr3yKQ1mY0gg79/xLSSG23NSDvzix+t1WYdp0AT03ZohQ8NjH+xuwMNiSNYU1f6d2poIVH18JmyPWd0tY13SAFlnBQTXjPE5B8hgksFzHRJFUkmNY+mtEDzSGYAgzuG110j1hJ39eitt+12ap4T7csF3pjQRHYFGwG26YONd3CxnvRnAWeuGKJkbkUdL0lDSCNxtvs4GFA==; 5:4d7G7+mDFb5eqOk36TnAp0/XV467XrdQz+XOcg/tKRWovIM3/wayIfMrQcsFz8Tzpjy0uOXMXP1mrphn/KHS2rzrsgeQKnUIy/DLKAReMWaG27qYNaWgfUSn0LAW2zmUY0gSk0TBoZdYUJ3yP0Uli1kfzEhJqZhLV4Ly/M9aTrE=; 7:DtvT4lYkcc5wuoyAdBMFwpxOWbrWdPR8tiLgd/x45MchDdQ3Vw3goAy4vDABSaufdMpLCpuvA/RTZVSItoEVPawHSlbjJV3gwz1IkN/1vtrQSJ7fgusLarVWmq0cu4Pp4aAseitIVbuo7QvoLACn7A==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f87eb7d3-801e-4d85-56c4-08d659d8ef00
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390098)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600074)(711020)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM0PR07MB4180;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB4180:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfa@btconnect.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB41802487DB0D357D14DF70AEA2AF0@AM0PR07MB4180.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3231455)(999002)(944501505)(52105112)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(148016)(149066)(150057)(6041310)(20161123562045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(201708071742011)(7699051)(76991095); SRVR:AM0PR07MB4180; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM0PR07MB4180;
x-forefront-prvs: 0876988AF0
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(366004)(346002)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(51444003)(15374003)(6436002)(66066001)(99286004)(97736004)(6116002)(3846002)(106356001)(53936002)(26005)(105586002)(33896004)(6506007)(386003)(102836004)(14496001)(71190400001)(68736007)(76176011)(52116002)(110136005)(86362001)(7736002)(5660300001)(446003)(71200400001)(14454004)(186003)(316002)(305945005)(256004)(486006)(25786009)(2906002)(6306002)(6512007)(9686003)(86152003)(44736005)(84392002)(6246003)(966005)(478600001)(8676002)(81156014)(39060400002)(81166006)(8936002)(229853002)(1556002)(476003)(6486002)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR07MB4180; H:AM0PR07MB4484.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 5J9/SjZOuka51yReIcmqgukdchdgXeQE/RNIDB7AZt6JKfFRBQo7WwG5b/qfC6VNGHS7lSWMI2VVV4t6eHKHAfsJbzlJoDBvNbLYsmnJF2Tj2RrWspOx1Ssy6+w3MD5/Dy1hnGrCXGTtO8mphQ12NcHBYwP+3le86xhO3mB3GvN3h+41ORNgL999Nd+J+hYu+/txNogsa2lnRI202Txrodvd7Af09Va6F0a2zFrw2uPUcqfY6WP4rOjV2sa6S/K8YsYgP8dyPF1TL8OxfhzlfhpmktvAbBnw8u8ewvwRdAbjWXQvsY8xLR868HL/P9D76jzxlHuFLcFU/6n4rIwmRmCLB1KqRY/c/Mx/hGL52sY=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <51DC9455C0872241B1B9D8A3920C39B5@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f87eb7d3-801e-4d85-56c4-08d659d8ef00
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Dec 2018 11:09:18.2557 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB4180
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/HKtJiUaNpGlfYGRlL7USZ2slark>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 11:09:23 -0000

Viewed as a YANG module, there are a number of defects in this I-D.  I
think that the flavour is well illustrated by:

- s.5 This document defines five YANG modules
The Table of Contents lists seven

Copyright statements are all 2014.

revision date of  s.6.1  is 2016-03-03

yang-version is a mixture of 1 and 1.1

IANA gets no mention, not even a TBD.

No mention of NMDA

The modules are devoid of any YANG reference statements, either for
import or for description.

No reference for Tree Diagrams.

No current reference for YANG itself or Interface Management

The (unanswered) technical question is why have so many modules; I am a
fan of separate modules for YANG types and YANG identities, since I see
them as having a different evolution, but that is not done here; rather,
the functionality is broken up, leading to more YANG prefixes, modules
that are more complex. Why?

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Tantsura" <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "RTGWG" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Cc: "Routing WG" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2018 2:30 AM
Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07


> Dear RTGWG,
>
> The authors have requested RTGWG to adopt
draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model as the working group document.
> The draft has received support during IETF101 meeting, authors have
addressed all the comments received.
>
> Please indicate support or no-support by December 15, 2018.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
to this
> email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document
will not
> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and each individual that has contributed to the document..
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff & Chris
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email