RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04.txt
Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com> Fri, 01 December 2017 19:55 UTC
Return-Path: <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A29127599; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:55:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2PZOMofzsViO; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:55:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4913D1286D6; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:55:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 06F3494A046B4; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 19:55:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 19:55:07 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.170]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.18]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:55:05 -0800
From: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
To: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>, "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
CC: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTat2g5MdouGoeSUy+3KOJ30T41qMu5h4A
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 19:55:04 +0000
Message-ID: <25B4902B1192E84696414485F5726854135262D1@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <151215778078.2767.10484055249395275469@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151215778078.2767.10484055249395275469@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.209.217.91]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/HodpKuLnOb-uOE5UbfA0zETGwe0>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 19:55:12 -0000
Dear All, Per responsible routing AD request, number of front page authors reduced to 5 and a minor editorial change. Otherwise, no other content changed. -- Uma C. (on behalf of all co-authors) -----Original Message----- From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 11:50 AM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : LFA selection for Multi-Homed Prefixes Authors : Pushpasis Sarkar Shraddha Hegde Uma Chunduri Jeff Tantsura Hannes Gredler Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04.txt Pages : 17 Date : 2017-12-01 Abstract: This document shares experience gained from implementing algorithms to determine Loop-Free Alternates for multi-homed prefixes. In particular, this document provides explicit inequalities that can be used to evaluate neighbors as a potential alternates for multi-homed prefixes. It also provides detailed criteria for evaluating potential alternates for external prefixes advertised by OSPF ASBRs. This documents updates and expands some of the "Routing Aspects" as specified in Section 6 of [RFC5286]. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lf… internet-drafts
- RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefi… Uma Chunduri