IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IP Traffic Engineering

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 27 September 2019 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF28A12008A for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.924
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.026, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YRAUHxjfXQ0W for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.30.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEFCE12000F for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw11.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.11]) by gproxy3.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDA840563 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:10:11 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id DdpqiYsO2KOX2DdpripBtv; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:10:11 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=adNPYygt c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10:nop_ipv6 a=J70Eh1EUuV4A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=hmwibAEDD-K2wS0zg2cA:9 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19 a=GHPjfNJ_CZmbNmT0:21 a=HbCGAY-3WHbmcG44:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=ZmnRXEOhYoUBVVkDJOsA:9 a=Ro5vzUdbOtltZfVS:21 a=hHDQYTxHygiBI_do:21 a=yVgjIChJkm12BcVj:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10:nop_html a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=o6Q8bMjeLF3kTeKmKmVX3j8cvnsMFqddtt7yKufkgBE=; b=UacIk1zoCrPQf2cow6NmXJQqZs Qoe3RYz8aFnTcBahPzELqIRNrYFZ60jDiQBvpD1y6z2eec3Dn32Hiq3Y+0YieJKHLndALT0PGZyqF W/gu7zfOadX2mTpakhYZrD3cf;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=29165 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1iDdpq-003yfP-QQ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:10:10 -0600
Subject: Re: IP Traffic Engineering
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <156953754350.31990.16627132446644830194@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOj+MMEEn9uGH-qjapYw2guxnipcYE0u-3PH6wWPECiCQDhXiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <4e6db4e3-f2a7-ad08-3b94-524adadf5ff9@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 20:10:10 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEEn9uGH-qjapYw2guxnipcYE0u-3PH6wWPECiCQDhXiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------88DF68CC20E728940F3275ED"
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1iDdpq-003yfP-QQ
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) [127.0.0.1]:29165
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Org: HG=bhcustomer;ORG=bluehost;
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/JWIodQKHq_hhAI6cBMaCtcn9N9M>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:10:16 -0000

I suspect this is in the scope of the TE Architecture ... (TEAS) WG...

On 9/26/2019 7:06 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Dear RTGWG,
>
> I just submitted a document where I present new perspective on traffic 
> engineering for IP networks. As the scope of the new architecture and 
> deployment target does not fit any other working group I decided to 
> submit it to RTGWG.
>
> Comments, opinions, contribution - very welcome !
>
> Kind regards,
> Robert.
>
> - - -
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
>
>
>         Title           : IP Traffic Engineering Architecture with 
> Network Programming
>         Author          : Robert Raszuk
>         Filename        : draft-raszuk-rtgwg-ip-te-np-00.txt
>         Pages           : 22
>         Date            : 2019-09-26
>
> Abstract:
>    This document describes a control plane based IP Traffic Engineering
>    Architecture where path information is kept in the control plane by
>    selected nodes instead of being inserted into each packet on ingress
>    of an administrative domain.  The described proposal is also fully
>    compatible with the concept of network programming.
>
>    It is positioned as a complimentary technique to native SRv6 and can
>    be used when there are concerns with increased packet size due to
>    depth of SID stack, possible concerns regarding exceeding MTU or more
>    strict simplicity requirements typically seen in number of enterprise
>    networks.  The proposed solution is applicable to both IPv4 or IPv6
>    based networks.
>
>    As an additional added value, detection of end to end path liveness
>    as well as dynamic path selection based on real time path quality is
>    integrated from day one in the design.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raszuk-rtgwg-ip-te-np/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raszuk-rtgwg-ip-te-np-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-raszuk-rtgwg-ip-te-np-00
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email