IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model

Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BE93A0D73; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HceZI5bIMQgQ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B0D3A0D6D; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id e23so5392615eja.3; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/wNMYYXtvb7V8lqFM5Fyi7WPh1zNkPwBdot1M+KtKKQ=; b=rILQrcv+iBnRaElTnOJdjicEqfsg47eAsUedTCwJbKd34thsluPccMEmF/+2Gvq0ss geA2Vt86l1gRsb4dbhSDQ81O3X5O0gj9Vq4ytqLECHAKbCkwgSHsQO8LyxFA7Iq5Solr mEEWkt3NPv6XOowWwxc+u12ymLLOfkwMvrjMXL2cRCi/OcMiWZu1lAtkbEcC/j2jTdZX bqqAck2jc6cvLakLJIBYBeINIDyZb+ZsdjwjYyyo/8tYgHFGQSrMf3YCeTVyUJfhIN9W 6zPN8BjXKNObk/vJHXi7Vu0cIh45Ktpz/f8m9AaNXpW6HqtXSEA+ValftLUlPG/WdaIM xZBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/wNMYYXtvb7V8lqFM5Fyi7WPh1zNkPwBdot1M+KtKKQ=; b=rtbmWHud5VurZHKlUwyqYevo6KrI4YHmn8yjWPycP5mTguntW6HZX92/NE93QTGku3 8+sGxwQu3mXQ/POlTWwoVwgoJBvs5rEis5BGBhnhh29+r1uhAuxJUZrjmhIPBSEBQrF4 JGji5vvhcVGrCgdqMlKnrFhaBhslw9dgqiGRxPdvLbDypAgwbI4RRhe8tjzkFHLqJj5L LN0qky1hsy/NO46v+2jm2J+iWD527veFW94q4BY0TvZVODTaOtm4AJF1HfY19QJWKYZj 8JKoCxJTIpSKIcgrTwND2keB98AHCxeHdSWgmLgilFaFjVne/moO0g//lSoJ3S+vBjFo Ggug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530flv1rDgKEPu3goTZ/YjHbnGiwgh/C9Zsu8HbUxMdUWYGEDaKj Zfhh5TX37gSCiqpAY8xBFMBwtH+cBD2rbDYW7++2rs5K9fk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKtdRRj50bRLcirQtwhokDOW8ypV1oSy51dIIfXhFl/FtFUgya6wz4KIJbFI/678jqsIcZuEhiozuyZNW7K/Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2115:: with SMTP id qn21mr5308838ejb.278.1599682073395; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHzoHbu7g7VifCVf4hEuvNkf46+3AG8_A6JhJdKQ5y2WN1njQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHzoHbtCvr+9pALnTeV_SQ8fGzebrvHBJ0014Kpxkspd4G+n-A@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB53400AD2E7D7D741B708C7A1A22D0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <D97B9C42-A24C-40E7-93E4-27F344AC9A9A@cisco.com> <DB7PR07MB5340CCD0ABC8382B77C12CECA2280@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5340CCD0ABC8382B77C12CECA2280@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:07:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHzoHbtUoyXg7i3epHzOzmUi1A2bUaN6Un9+t5S+6r8aq4JQjw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bd06e005aee70113"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/JnVDmuQBozko6DZMMYjsGjwDSzs>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 20:07:56 -0000

RTGWG,

I think there is rough WG consensus to submit draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model
to the IESG for publication.  I will include a description of the
discussion related to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model in the shepherd writeup.  It
will likely take the IESG several months to publish
draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model.  If there are changes in
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model that make it desirable to change the text of the
example in draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model before publication, then any
changes in draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model will be discussed within RTGWG.

Thanks,
Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email