IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: working group adoption call for draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model; draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-lne-model and draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 07 June 2016 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D604A12D50D for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n6TuL1h7qAFe for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57FC512D0F6 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8941; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1465334424; x=1466544024; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=gx+9o5qXNHC31GjccBHf7AUZZwWsZYwK2HJhZ6uFDVU=; b=cJkdWuJ4wfmVBKX5h8hgGMou71iJCxJCmRTimM4b1oqlKEjFcpPqQDPu VP6i+vtMjJpsEplJB7AIq6ARtTnordB1QkZJULXVXZsD7WQ2q7LqdNnAq SIRbvECqVyk8ZBnXXT4KtrpMvegycWLECDrRjUH18DJfiV9khDGVKvwnW o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C/BQBMOVdX/5JdJa1cgnBOVn0GrneGfYR+gXmGEwIcgSc6EgEBAQEBAQFlJ4RFAQEBBB0GSwYVAgEIEQMBAiQEAwICAh8RFAkIAgQBEogVAxerU40XDYQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdinSCQ4FPEQE8gmGCWQWYFzQBjCyBeoFqhFKIZIdzh2sBJQUqgjmBNW6IWjZ/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,435,1459814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="112785971"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jun 2016 21:20:23 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u57LKN4K002379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 21:20:23 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:20:22 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:20:22 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: working group adoption call for draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model; draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-lne-model and draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model
Thread-Topic: working group adoption call for draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model; draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-lne-model and draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model
Thread-Index: AQHRwQFeH4PJHunuskeV4GymWk/i6J/egsIA
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 21:20:22 +0000
Message-ID: <D37CB272.63A59%acee@cisco.com>
References: <8A056C97-7D5A-4A52-8D55-19BEC054E2BD@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8A056C97-7D5A-4A52-8D55-19BEC054E2BD@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D37CB27263A59aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/KR6KQCc4UJuxggM3FSzigFV12YI>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 21:20:26 -0000

Hi Jeff,

As an author, I support RTG WG adoption of these documents and am happy they are being homed in the RTG WG.

I don’ t know of any relevant IPR on any of the three documents or YANG models.

Thanks,
Acee

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 5:12 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Subject: working group adoption call for draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model; draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-lne-model and draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model

Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt:
draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model;  draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-lne-model and draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model as working group documents.

There was good support during the last IETF meeting.
Please indicate support or no-support by June 22nd, 2016.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.

Thanks,

Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email