Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa

Yingzhen Qu <> Mon, 18 December 2017 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BAB12D853; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:19:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.33
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.33 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3T_XFC_1AJR; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE22B12D854; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:19:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3CDF8E6460693; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:19:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:19:26 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:19:19 -0800
From: Yingzhen Qu <>
To: Shraddha Hegde <>, RTGWG <>
CC: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
Thread-Topic: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
Thread-Index: AQHTauu9R23laVmwZUaixe7xOAEAoaND69PwgAYffoA=
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:19:19 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9A2F5204DBBE48E3BF7BD5CAD00CF24Bhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:19:31 -0000

Hi all,

The WG Last Call has completed. Publication of this draft will be requested.


From: Shraddha Hegde <>
Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 8:55 PM
To: Yingzhen Qu <>om>, RTGWG <>
Cc: "" <>rg>, "" <>
Subject: RE: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa


I am not aware of any IPR other than the Juniper declared one.


From: Yingzhen Qu []
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 3:01 AM
To: RTGWG <>
Subject: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa


The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa. Since both Jeff and Chris are author/contributor of this draft, I’ll be running the LC.

There was consensus that document is ready for the last call and the authors have resolved all the comments from shepherd review.
Please indicate support or no-support by December 18, 2017.

An IPR call has been done in October, all co-authors have responded except Shraddha Hegde (please let me know if I overlooked your response).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor and haven’t responded to the IPR call, please respond to this
email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.


rtgwg mailing list<><>