IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 12 February 2016 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606811A87C7 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:17:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xw2c5gW2ZNBP for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:17:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2427F1A87C3 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:17:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4539; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1455301047; x=1456510647; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=whQUKR3huS9UzpDq8VeGEKewEyUQWa6TPyPWOaMVbFU=; b=gbuZyWj92iILNb/uYEVpj5+XDoTTeDvMRJvG5joKMfQ5PQqiB2EoY4JX 14sHky/vav0Hm/fsmU6FRiA83ekejt6M2v8jMOv2Y/STv9XKxuAvNlyXG kyDyo2FwLhMDRnJqiNDebrkKkE5LBzv/zWon7AlYLzLfoG2+l8dI9BQlq s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D8AQC+IL5W/4kNJK1egm5MgT8GiFWxMgENgWeGDQIcgR44FAEBAQEBAQGBCoRBAQEBBCNmAgEIBA0DAQIoAwICAjAUCQgCBAESiBqyeI5rAQEBAQEBAQECAQEBAQEBARmKR4RSgmCBOgWWdwGNVIFehEOIVY49AR4BAUKDZGqHLnwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.22,436,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="72810401"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 12 Feb 2016 18:17:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (xch-rcd-012.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u1CIHQVU020680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:17:26 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:17:25 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:17:25 -0600
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08
Thread-Topic: poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08
Thread-Index: AQHRZcD2LWK9o3cuBkyeT/9FOM/BiJ8oyHuA
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:17:25 +0000
Message-ID: <D2E38B64.4D164%acee@cisco.com>
References: <A45E3A4B-AE6B-4790-BE8F-A2239BEC4221@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <A45E3A4B-AE6B-4790-BE8F-A2239BEC4221@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2E38B644D164aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/L4MreOlftPAUsy_9_dj1v4roDeQ>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:17:28 -0000

Hey Jeff,
I say that if the authors are committed, we go ahead and complete it. If not, we drop it.
Thanks,
Acee

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com<mailto:jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>>
Date: Friday, February 12, 2016 at 1:12 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Subject: poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08

Dear RTGWG,

We are considering further progress of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08 and would like to poll the wg to see whether there’s enough interest to proceed with this work, i.e. WGLC.
Please respond, especially if you feel this work has to continue, also - please let us know if there are any existing implementations.

Many thanks and see you in Buenos Aires.

Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email