Re: WG adoption poll on draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-04

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 11 October 2016 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D241295B4; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 07:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KlDLMwNxfLcH; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 07:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BA041200DF; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 07:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8085; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1476197318; x=1477406918; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=oy0yePwjEah64EGCpnUMNHpiwIqMlUefgLmirPc7vR8=; b=RjM1AayhM2Xs7KFShHQVfAZKIwJF26SVCj4fBkSwYlIA1OLT/WAsKPUG bT6uv9h7LOVK+9kfU/jgb1si0oHoKCNZ4CQsPUjNO1ylm08N8hOAjDyc3 0NbiUVBBnD+ivGQMReRtWKxiiACwHE4J4XHipQ5Y6PQK/cTxDkO8WkxVR 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DRAwBF+/xX/4oNJK1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgwc1AQEBAQEdV3wHhCSJCJcEjyCFFIILIoV+AhqBazgUAQIBAQEBAQEBXieEYQEBAQQjCj4DBhUCAQgOAwMBAigDAgICMBQJCAEBBAESiFAOtW2NDQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEaBYsShBkRATyCZIJbBZQohVoBhiaJVoFuhGeJIIx5g34BHjZNhGByhgKBIIEAAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,329,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="158554074"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Oct 2016 14:48:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9BEmOqT014446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:48:24 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:48:23 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:48:23 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll on draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-04
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll on draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-04
Thread-Index: AdIaZGPlJxb+ITrzQuavzBeZL6nhIQJah0AA
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:48:23 +0000
Message-ID: <D42273C8.8233E%acee@cisco.com>
References: <MWHPR05MB282912503287BCA31D5B5E46A9CE0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR05MB282912503287BCA31D5B5E46A9CE0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.200]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D42273C88233Eaceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/NNNpjXqikSV7nG-KsAfymF7yL-Y>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:48:40 -0000

While I originally didn’t think this was necessary, I can see the use case and support RTG WG adoption.
Thanks,
Acee

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net<mailto:cbowers@juniper.net>>
Date: Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 11:44 AM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>>
Subject: WG adoption poll on draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-04

RTGWG,

This email starts a two week poll to gauge consensus on adopting draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-04
as an RTGWG working group document.

The BFD working group is also copied on this adoption poll.  We encourage participants in
BFD working group to provide their input on the adoption poll.  And should this document
be adopted as an RTGWG document, we would plan to copy the BFD WG on emails
related to this document to benefit from the BFD expertise in that WG in the development
of this document.

Please send your comments to the RTGWG mailing list (rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>) indicating support
or opposition to the adoption of this document, along with the reasoning for that support
or opposition.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email stating
whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.   The response needs to be sent to the
RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has
been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.

At this point, the document has the following IPR disclosure associated with it.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2739/

This adoption poll will end on Friday October 14th.

Thanks,
Chris and Jeff