Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa

"Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com> Mon, 24 September 2018 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6053F130DCF for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oAguI5amWWpl for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48C51252B7 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3170; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1537803526; x=1539013126; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YNAcobulvCsf2n0o3/9XFgRCj38gZ8bDTo2k7S1CUFQ=; b=ht53kTRKMJ3WOPpm4xpQPItqnU4DMjefu25Wf5qWUPnCuzQMyPW7sR60 OsaQQRTzzxTew8+IGeDiAeofgWQYNij1gqqG7FO9cnYUx/HicLFZeHlbS FleOmkqMLInfwqlmXu4zRnSsQJxMBzDbPXJ0wSdSfaOasOlY5y4FcH15N 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AIAACQBKlb/xbLJq1bGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUYJzbRIojAlfjViWTxSBZgsYC4RJAoN6NBgBAwEBAgEBAm0cDIU4AQEBAQMBATABBTYGFQsOAwQBAQEnBycfCQgGAQwGAgEBgx0BggEPo16EKwFLhQ0Fiw+BQT+BOYJrgxsBAQOBKwESAUuFLAKILIsziSAJAoZBiWAGF4FFhFGCYIY2i3qDAYVnAgQLAhSBQjhkcXAVO4JsixaFQD0winuCPQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,298,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="6707036"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Sep 2018 15:38:32 +0000
Received: from [10.60.210.99] (ams-cfilsfil-8812.cisco.com [10.60.210.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w8OFcVBo000733 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:38:32 GMT
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
To: Ahmed Bashandy <abashandy.ietf@gmail.com>, bruno.decraene@orange.com, Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <SN6PR05MB44300874E544A6CD494D291CA9250@SN6PR05MB4430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <27088_1533831423_5B6C68FF_27088_179_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47B1C8FC@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <df75d03c-e58e-fa16-f389-0972fa12ece8@gmail.com>
From: "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <d41d7de5-caf8-73c1-3dc1-bcfd16ea8c9e@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:38:31 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <df75d03c-e58e-fa16-f389-0972fa12ece8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Authenticated-User: cfilsfil
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.210.99, ams-cfilsfil-8812.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/O4ZwYIPZv9Qm8E6B2LL-KC6KDmA>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:38:49 -0000

Sorry for the delay.

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.

Cheers,
Clarence


On 24/09/2018 13:29, Ahmed Bashandy wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply
> 
> I am not aware of any non-disclosed IPR
> 
> Ahmed
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/9/18 9:17 AM, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote:
>>
>> I’m not aware of non-disclosed IPR.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --Bruno
>>
>> *From:*rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Chris Bowers
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 09, 2018 4:30 PM
>> *To:* rtgwg@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* WG adoption poll for 
>> draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
>>
>> RTGWG,
>>
>> Jeff and I think it makes sense to adopt 
>> draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
>>
>> as a working group document.
>>
>> There has been a lot of useful discussion about this draft on the 
>> list..  However, the text of the
>>
>> draft has not been modified to reflect a good deal of valid feedback 
>> from reviewers.
>>
>> We intend to address this issue if and when the draft becomes a 
>> working group document.
>>
>> Please indicate your support or opposition to the adoption of this draft.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond 
>> to this email stating
>>
>> whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.   The response needs 
>> to be sent to the
>>
>> RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage 
>> until a response has
>>
>> been received from each author and each individual that has 
>> contributed to the document.
>>
>> At this point, the document has the following IPR disclosure 
>> associated with it.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3068/
>>
>> This adoption poll will end on August 24^th .
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Chris and Jeff
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>
>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtgwg mailing list
>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>