Re: KRP ID Discussion.

Khaled,

Physical network topologies do not follow geo nor political boundaries. Any
solution based on the above is simply not practical.

Best,
R.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:00 AM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
wrote:

> Dear RTGWG members,
>
>
>
> As you saw, I wasn’t able to present the KRP ID during the IETF 108 online
> meeting due to personal reasons, but you still have the chance to read and
> add your comments to make the draft take the best form to make progress,
> all participants are encouraged to modify the recent version and if
> something is unclear don’t hesitate to ask.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Khaled Omar
>
>
>
> *From:* Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 11:36 PM
> *To:* Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>; rtgwg-chairs <
> rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: KRP ID Discussion.
>
>
>
> Hi Khaled Omar,
>
>
>
> Instead of only asking me to review the draft, a better way is to send an
> email to rtgwg@ietf.org and ask people to review it. You can include a
> pointer to your slides as well, and people interested in this topic will
> send their comments.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yingzhen
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:18 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Yingzhen,
>
>
>
> As my online participation to discuss KRP was not successful, it will be
> great if you read the draft and tell me your opinions, comments and
> suggestions so we can work on it and move it to the next better form.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Khaled Omar
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>