I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-01.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 23 June 2015 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F85F1A9069; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 01:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O71DtH7twl9p; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 01:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB36D1A905F; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 01:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-01.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.3.p3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150623080634.12464.87550.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 01:06:34 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/QEFiRWQsj1JjhVkgrN-MrqVVVC8>
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:06:36 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Link State protocols SPF trigger and delay algorithm impact on IGP micro-loops
        Authors         : Stephane Litkowski
                          Bruno Decraene
                          Martin Horneffer
	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-01.txt
	Pages           : 14
	Date            : 2015-06-23

Abstract:
   A micro-loop is a packet forwarding loop that may occur transiently
   among two or more routers in a hop-by-hop packet forwarding paradigm.

   In this document, we are trying to analyze the impact of using
   different Link State IGP implementations in a single network in
   regards of micro-loops.  The analysis is focused on the SPF triggers
   and SPF delay algorithm.



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-01

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-01


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/