IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps

Lin He <helin1170@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2022 02:40 UTC

Return-Path: <helin1170@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365893A0764; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.857
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.857 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3JzT055zU8M6; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF833A0771; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id b16so5311629ioz.3; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 19:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yjWZ3sUAc/TOJ+1JQUCxcDa5zp/ABqE2fnBWHaNFvpo=; b=P0xp0k7wAokshh0Jvg95jvkygCoOXWxZqQAL/gDD190hPZ6Yp79k1tpSH4S+ZY9xYo lahS+3KO/N6QFGyY8iYj9WFs7ShzoaoP2tyCD6EEcSSgu2C8pjr9gnMxt9RkF7tK9lLK icJdrqgIOObBVtqtxEA6PPGHDVlFEdltODQu8MxTdbcd0Cs8h+D7ifwITCsFWP9CzJlq TJh3Wtsp05+5C0vRD5e7dJKhB0iolu01+W01bVC4ejr3Ehhq7OyzVd4oJWWAMVyExglA DgDxzQxFzAm7A0RBRpYo/K+8kosCmn0+ZBewXZyohytx7KkEHSalRnoNE5MT1rZQcra0 DmwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=yjWZ3sUAc/TOJ+1JQUCxcDa5zp/ABqE2fnBWHaNFvpo=; b=Cb+IYowMIj/Sur2DMmhWl5w+aLphOmuiYxSA0tgQgBRKAes2vRdN+lDLTPZI6P/z+o GFBgNU1uM0YH3+3fRkUgLaPeWDg16TiAADPsVoiOugDckO2bDiwaVb2371bxJCinCzLD E6KnztyIT6UXxD9PN6sJDRHjSpmk9djj1+NFNLcG2strak6XrxHKTCAYHI3smqr5TwmY YqPQ3vWonqum4mS4+rkYFadV86zyig3lRbv4ItD9L5mDbeDnQp3jSs1u01OSoO81su3H 6Y9V5IW7NiLDD6aW5zpSmzTUitSh4hYZhIPWcRldhpo30/1flraQaJz3v50hdWMMGizW t4og==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gQjO7asaI47vEgyVvXGhlf+5blAWV6rWFXKhbhufXAbKqhp3B BdGnoBv/V+Ud70qMqggxFUTnTGnwwRq4ckm/nZJaTbfBL2cmeSB6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGOkZ6JT4AVucTu8kdfluCSxBoNtdyq1OXiqeS5/HnWkYcDdR+8KfuWMbzVHsA3t+hoTUaUSHwKRhqMRMJDdY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:1389:b0:323:95c9:6727 with SMTP id w9-20020a056638138900b0032395c96727mr5873980jad.197.1649299242583; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 19:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202204070906037296266@chinaunicom.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202204070906037296266@chinaunicom.cn>
From: Lin He <helin1170@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:40:06 +0800
Message-ID: <CABtDdH1ddkw=XTH1xAWSuMKDnKG4M=zcOiob8M8aB=-VmXOp-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
To: rtgwg <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, rtg-ads <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007b8e2205dc07679e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/RTEDGnJjLQiyqUNRR9aUekLDAAo>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 02:40:48 -0000

Hi, all!

We have been working on APN, and it would be great to have a dedicated
working group to consolidate the APN framework.

Yours Sincerely,

Lin He

Tsinghua University


> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 1:15 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear RTGWG,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution
>> of the
>>
>> documents, including the scope of the problem and framework.  This topic
>> needs
>>
>> collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be
>> addressed are
>>
>> within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area.
>>
>>
>>
>> RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of
>> different options and one option for handling
>>
>> such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG.
>>
>> The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a
>> focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after
>> delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN.
>>
>>
>>
>> We would like to solicit the WG for opinions.  Please note that comments
>> about
>>
>> existing APN documents should be sent to apn@ietf.org.  This thread
>> focuses on
>>
>> support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation
>> of a
>>
>> new WG.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please send your comments, support, or objectiond.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Yingzhen  Jeff
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtgwg mailing list
>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>>
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email