Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Fri, 24 August 2018 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B47F130DDE for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TbOfmOZ_u1ZC for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ABA3130DD3 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2077; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1535131045; x=1536340645; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oxxs770ScJws6OjjDFqNFWaHMgWqxtAi/Ee05CVQA0o=; b=WAqhgbVw4uhAMMMTe5y5iHHF2zuiKowAxFa1dZ9oKCTYY6PqgrKN4UGJ d8bvyqCO08LOC7BqXdPIR66BVjlw0NMjEBaK0bOspFAn8mf41xeTWRRUC w9Hp7lHsTXry6BcnsVtfOPlK8m210mkzjBVZzP/r03Gr8mjCDWxNMTUtv o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C+AADPPIBb/xbLJq1bGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEIAQEBAYQ0bRIog2+IDV+NIS2WIoF6CxgNhEcCgzE0GAECAQECAQECbRw?= =?us-ascii?q?MhTgBAQEDAQEhFTYbCxIGAgImAgInIg4TBgIBAYMdAYIBD6NGgS6EaoV6gQu?= =?us-ascii?q?ILIFBP4E5gmuDGwEBAgEBFoIUgjSCVwKNVo1NCYYziTYGF4E+SINoglSGAYs?= =?us-ascii?q?ZgkGFaoFBOIFSMxoIGxUaIYJpCYsMhT8+MI9aAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,283,1531785600"; d="scan'208";a="6081150"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Aug 2018 17:17:23 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.158] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com [10.63.23.158]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w7OHHNVd012779 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 17:17:23 GMT
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
References: <153513080167.23068.13986732289959388709@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <9b09507f-aec3-eae1-cc40-823125bbb00a@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:17:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <153513080167.23068.13986732289959388709@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.63.23.158, dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/S2Nv0dNOBeU1RwVE0i08XW6phi0>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 17:17:27 -0000

The -01 version fixes some of the comments raised during WG adoption, 
but further work is in progress to improve the language, so expect a 
properly updated version before the IETF 103.

Thanks,
Rob

On 24/08/2018 18:13, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : YANG Data Model for ARP
>          Authors         : Feng Zheng
>                            Bo Wu
>                            Robert Wilton
>                            Xiaojian Ding
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 17
> 	Date            : 2018-08-24
>
> Abstract:
>     This document defines a YANG data model for the management of the
>     Address Resolution Protocol (ARP).  It extends the basic ARP
>     functionality contained in the ietf-ip YANG data model, defined in
>     RFC 8344, to provide management of optional ARP features and
>     statistics.
>
>     The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
>     Management Datastore Architecture defined in RFC 8342.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> .
>