Re: [netmod] questions about draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

On August 26, 2015 6:24:19 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder 
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:41:26AM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/26/15, 2:40 AM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Hopefully, a decision to change all existing models (including vendor
>> >> > models!) will be based on something more technical than the fact that
>> >> > a group of people "really like it" some other way.
>> >>
>> >> I'm equally unsure that having an argument of "I got there first" is a
>> >> compelling argument given the number of folks (including vendors) who
>> >> have stated willingness (or even support) for change.  I think having a
>> >> major class of users stand up and say this is important should garner
>> >> some notice.
>> >
>> >Please keep in mind that we are talking about several published
>> >proposed standards that have been implemented and deployed. I think
>> >there must be convincing technical reasons to declare them broken and
>> >to redo them.
>>
>> Other than adding /device at the top, we are not obsoleting RFC 7223. The
>> current device model keeps the interfaces configuration silo and merely
>> augments it with a binding to the logical-networking-element.
>>
>
> For the sake of clarity, these are the YANG data models that are
> published as Proposed Standard RFCs:
>
> - RFC 6022 NETCONF Monitoring
> - RFC 6536 NETCONF Access Control Model
> - RFC 7223 Interface Management
> - RFC 7277 IP Management
> - RFC 7317 System Management
> - RFC 7407 SNMP Configuration
>
> I see text in draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00 that seems to
> affect pretty much all of them.

Agreed. Although we're proposing reusing / rehoming them.

> I also do not see "augments it (RFC
> 7223) with a binding to the logical-networking-element" in the YANG
> fragment in draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00.
>

This omission has been pointed out before.  We need to fix that.

Lou

> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   [phone]         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>