Re: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-08.txt

Tomonori Takeda <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Wed, 26 December 2018 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D2F130E3D; Tue, 25 Dec 2018 17:12:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ur4B6qZLrcRb; Tue, 25 Dec 2018 17:11:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C45712894E; Tue, 25 Dec 2018 17:11:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.86.154]) by tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wBQ1BrfP011669; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:11:53 +0900
Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF8663865B; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:11:53 +0900 (JST)
Received: from jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.87.134]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18596384BE; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:11:53 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [129.60.13.98]) by jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 960F2400CCC; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:11:53 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-08.txt
References: <1ebfd8bb-20df-b469-4806-7d8b305d2e20@lab.ntt.co.jp> <12528_1545399998_5C1CEEBE_12528_299_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B787B85@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Tomonori Takeda <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Message-ID: <f6576a8a-f40a-5a3e-bd82-ea4e16281b1b@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:11:36 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <12528_1545399998_5C1CEEBE_12528_299_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B787B85@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CC-Mail-RelayStamp: 1
To: stephane.litkowski@orange.com, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Cc: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/SBIBsVhXgSQKZweu1ahBxUNfX6o>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 01:12:01 -0000

Thanks!

Tomo

On 2018/12/21 22:46, stephane.litkowski@orange.com wrote:
> The -09 has been published and should address your comment.
> 
> Feel free to raise any additional concern.
> 
> Brgds,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomonori Takeda [mailto:takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 10:13
> To: rtg-ads@ietf.org
> Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org
> Subject: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-08.txt
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
> The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
> drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and
> sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide
> assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing
> Directorate, please see
> ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
> 
> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
> would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF
> Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
> discussion or by updating the draft.
> 
>    Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-08.txt
>    Reviewer: Tomonori Takeda
>    Review Date: Dec. 17th, 2018
>    IETF LC End Date: Dec. 18th, 2018
>    Intended Status: Informational
> 
> Summary:
> This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
> should be considered prior to publication.
> 
> Comments:
> This document analyzes the impact of SPF delay algorithm and associated
> triggers on IGP micro-loops. This document presents useful information
> on how mixing strategies may lead to longer micro-loops. The document is
> well organized, easy to read.
> 
> Major Issues:
> None
> 
> Minor Issues:
> None
> 
> Nits:
> 1) Section 2 says
> 
>     "That part may be the main part for the first iteration but is not for
>      subsequent IGP events.  In addition, this part is very implementation
>      specific and difficult/impossible to standardize, while the SPF delay
>      algorithm may be standardized."
> 
> It would be better to explain what "That part" and "this part" mean.
> I guess the text should look like:
> 
>     "The time to update the FIB may be the main part for the first
>      iteration of IGP event but is not for subsequent IGP events.
>      In addition, the time to update the FIB is very implementation
>      specific and difficult/impossible to standardize, while the SPF delay
>      algorithm may be standardized."
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Tomonori Takeda
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 

-- 
Tomonori Takeda
NTT Network Service Systems Labs.
+81-422-59-7092