New Liaison Statement, "IESG follow-up regarding 'Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture'"

Liaison Statement Management Tool <statements@ietf.org> Thu, 21 November 2019 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <statements@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAD91208B2; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:22:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Liaison Statement Management Tool <statements@ietf.org>
To: ylavoie@iol.unh.edu
Cc: liaisons@broadband-forum.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, rtg-ads@ietf.org, The IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: New Liaison Statement, "IESG follow-up regarding 'Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture'"
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.110.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <157432457689.28773.7945169403657417622.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:22:56 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/SUQJEl103p6IHJPvdRNS_82PsiA>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:22:57 -0000

Title: IESG follow-up regarding 'Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture'
Submission Date: 2019-11-21
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1662/

From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: ylavoie@iol.unh.edu
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>,The IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>,liaisons@broadband-forum.org,rtgwg@ietf.org,rtg-ads@ietf.org
Response Contacts: The IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>
Technical Contacts: iesg@ietf.org
Purpose: In response

Referenced liaison: Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1615/)

Referenced liaison: Response to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1619/)

Referenced liaison: Follow-on response to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1631/)

Referenced liaison: Follow-on to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1651/)

Referenced liaison: Follow-on to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1660/)

Body: The IETF thanks the Broadband Forum for your two liaisons both titled, "Follow-on to IETF liaison: 'Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture'" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1660/ and https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1651/). We appreciate the Broadband Forum's responsive action on this important topic and your work to keep the IETF apprised of your progress, including sharing the draft document with details of the ongoing work.  

The two liaisons and draft document were recently discussed within the IESG. Our conclusion from the liaisons and information provided, is that the Broadband Forum's selection of 3GPP's PFCP protocol for use between the DBNG Control Plane (CP) and User Plane (UP) indicates there is no current need for the IETF to develop a protocol to address this use case.  Consequently, and in the spirit of cooperation and maintaining the cordial, productive relationship between our two organizations, consideration of all IETF work related to Disaggregated BNG suspended in March will not be resumed.

Should the Broadband Forum require assistance from the IETF on this topic going forward, please inform the relevant IETF Area(s) via liaison and we will consider the request accordingly.  We look forward to our continued work with the Broadband Form, in particular on the many other topics where our two organizations are cooperating.

Sincerely,
Alissa Cooper
IETF Chair, on behalf of the IESG
Attachments:

No document has been attached