Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with COMMENT)

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Thank you Xufeng,

Just one comment left:

I have to refer to an appendix to find the answerhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A
Why don't you have the full tree from the appendix in a new section 2.X?

Anyway, this is a comment, so up to the responsible AD to decide.

Regards, Benoit
> Hi Benoit,
>
> Thanks for the comments. We have updated the document to address these comments, in a new revision https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09. Please check if this is ok.
>
> Regards,
> - Xufeng
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 3:35 AM
>> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: [e-mail]; Yingzhen Qu
>> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with
>> COMMENT)
>>
>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
>> paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> - I support Kathleen's DISCUSS.
>>
>> - I like the way sections 2.2 and 2.3 are constructed. Thanks.
>> In section 2.4 that's a pity that we don't see which per instance oper states and
>> stats are available.
>>
>>           +--ro <per instance operational states>
>>              +--ro statistics
>>                 +--ro <per instance statistics>
>>
>> I have to refer to an appendix to find the answer
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A Why don't
>> you have the full tree as from the appendix in 2.X?
>>
>> - No need to include the WG chairs in the YANG module, as per 6087bis
>>
>>          WG Chair: Jeff Tantsura
>>                    <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>
>>          WG Chair: Chris Bowers
>>                    <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>
>> - The following two references must point to the working group documents
>>
>>     [I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis]
>>                Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
>>                Management", draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 (work in
>>                progress), August 2017.
>>
>>     [I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis]
>>                Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management",
>>                draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 (work in progress),
>>                August 2017.
>>
>> - Thanks for the appendix B. It's always useful.
>> Note: I have not validated the instance.
>>