Re: New Document

Sanjiv Kapoor <kapoor@iit.edu> Tue, 21 March 2017 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <kapoor@iit.edu>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382B2129B10 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iit-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZMNeZRYhbDSg for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A533A129B9C for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id d188so98233329vka.0 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iit-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YHUL03dW0uhrspA39cRVvR9dCvmuJARc3lJGeZ5Fr/8=; b=QFJ4BHHz/+W4leWaxSxRHZbtQXngRf3CzaJ1HOQ4F0F5WhdJGDRNeYy0DA7DKws1QM v1RIEb9T1HbDIwoO3eAeIVDWWbvzFhw1EH98LdzcVwI2qq3EOLjRm76C/0hFAtE2kcL4 8G6VOuJdhhQQ/UrxvFM3xkFOzjokZ0kQ6gdP9yKPCRheRFQwkDdm1hcLA+tuConKsZSd Y19BMl32goi3IPdgOBA6csAEk20C1tWo6JHRCrgMOedTScSAVGKP0rKDXBLjjALEeRNb uKgiOdb9kJz27bemrJAVdu9jhS5TiTDnGqgOJk7+XgzHTD7VWzp/kz8pPA19BHY8VKBV EQpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YHUL03dW0uhrspA39cRVvR9dCvmuJARc3lJGeZ5Fr/8=; b=Sn3lpOyGn7dIxTvvXvjdjugGZ6mhI1fqJ/FNt3Y0+eHB4WWwojjT8pLEJgCdn1uNkR q3dGWGviKieAuAow9ATgyV3Mx0KfSVcpwtcB6OaVZOh+7JgggQIR9l8BNARsIIx80C1e CRnMAsjka41W94d4o5RE1e1wZfwg8dsF+VUaf06P0pRMv4o4/U+/mpQXjMLxWIIav5cj Z/I/pXkQs5Bt/fD1Qj3J00jQE8EqVVAqBfeDgDJrVoRHxyci/qjVw7MBXMcsnzVx1yMl jyCpfc3vBv/YPZmwk5sxgQq+J5/OH3a5PSPDR16kRUN4AJuUDrZ4nQNJJ+3HWgFR4LvB 4ANQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2sHGC6Mn6Zn5JTkm7coryaieJUlMPfMRiyoxZ7qFljcOgyCZYe3ZL9JZBuUkn9zSwFMrXYA3IC18Q3zm4Y
X-Received: by 10.31.3.203 with SMTP id f72mr14460821vki.108.1490111077693; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.90.9 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hOpa5fJOdURpA=fXzs3q=yEqiuLGCfn47S5egPzMWVttw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANMez7MtLVN3TFKFGEnDUNh5B+b=ObN5yHuj25yKE2gydy_QBA@mail.gmail.com> <CANMez7NCsNQs68RAjsGdkcoPxPqUGnJ_pVL=5KS70QQwvgrCgw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hOpa5fJOdURpA=fXzs3q=yEqiuLGCfn47S5egPzMWVttw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sanjiv Kapoor <kapoor@iit.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:44:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CANMez7MMj66rKoRiGFFC1m3R59Nn=cNsFEmN2_4vFsP=N77B4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Document
To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org, Fab Devetak <fabriziod@att.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114280b07658c8054b3f853a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/U1XJ1F2s8k4GfcqN73jLzIU0-7k>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:46:50 -0000

Thanks for the link.

(At least) One key  difference to note is that we utilize multiple paths to
increase throughput.

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> welcome, IME this still largely holds  (as Acee uses to describe those
> things "oldie but goodie" ;-)
>
> http://zoo.cs.yale.edu/classes/cs433/cs433-2013-fall/
> readings/arpanet_routing.pdf
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Sanjiv Kapoor <kapoor@iit.edu> wrote:
>
>> As Jeff suggested, I am inviting  discussion on
>> Re: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kapoor-rtgwg-
>> dynamic-multipath-routing-00.txt
>>
>> This document introduces a method for simultaneous routing and congestion
>> control across multi-path flows. The basic methods for change of flow is an
>> additive increase and multiplicative decrease on congestion (like TCP).
>> Extra flow requirements and  congestion is dealt with by finding additional
>> (shortest ) paths using the queue length as a measure for congestion at the
>> links. This requires knowledge of the link state.
>>
>> There are two methods described, the second method achieves fair
>> distribution of traffic flow by using a concurrency parameter, Gamma, which
>> alters the cost of paths being used by a particular source destination
>> traffic flow.
>>
>> These methods  have been simulated (by Fab) using  NS3 and results may be
>> found on
>>
>> http://www.cs.iit.edu/~kapoor/papers/reducerate.pdf
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Sanjiv Kapoor <kapoor@iit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> A new  Internet Draft
>>>
>>>    https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kapoor-rtgwg-d
>>> ynamic-multipath-routing-00.txt
>>>
>>> has been posted.
>>>
>>> Please send us comments.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Sanjiv Kapoor
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtgwg mailing list
>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
> the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
> that is not true.*
> —Robert Wilensky
>