I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-11.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 25 June 2015 12:13 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2671A00EF; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2q65qdYhRfot; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EA21A00D6; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-11.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.4.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150625121343.5217.86141.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:13:43 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/U7pbC81cOGrRk-B-IbcuoQN6nUg>
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:13:44 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. Title : Operational management of Loop Free Alternates Authors : Stephane Litkowski Bruno Decraene Clarence Filsfils Kamran Raza Martin Horneffer Pushpasis Sarkar Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-11.txt Pages : 29 Date : 2015-06-25 Abstract: Loop Free Alternates (LFA), as defined in RFC 5286 is an IP Fast ReRoute (IP FRR) mechanism enabling traffic protection for IP traffic (and MPLS LDP traffic by extension). Following first deployment experiences, this document provides operational feedback on LFA, highlights some limitations, and proposes a set of refinements to address those limitations. It also proposes required management specifications. This proposal is also applicable to remote LFA solution. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-11 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-11 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-11… internet-drafts