Re: WG adoption poll on draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-04

Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 12 October 2016 06:00 UTC

Return-Path: <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13971295D3; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XtQIUuahGxiz; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22e.google.com (mail-yb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED541295BC; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 191so16344760ybv.3; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+Nlm+5B80OB6nz5PkpGMFfjl6o/oMKaVTSW0OEE8jtA=; b=IUkdcza3rfWBQ2ackQ3kAeZbnoN80fjKSgNEFHYKO5eMX5JZY0EzvXe1Wg4L3j0BcQ wlpwR6NT+34e1FOLjgnFLscg5hd7VE9tdq8oZcgXfTRUvJdv4pMArXJWO1oaVW63jceA u9ACUfMm/++q7lsNf1LCxdHXz2gaJ6Qt9UmJPFMIASocKLkRlPeN1fux34dWB//luiDQ +tPAZjGjyUEmr231uCGvRHH8f9o0oDUsByJV82yskfzyg3VANVUfVrDdZgrypUMb8zSW KdUl7yWt69hM+dHTkHYdR/uVqw8OS+p/ftvDnHPZNfU/iDDKufC9CYahzQCpaRjPk21q ol5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+Nlm+5B80OB6nz5PkpGMFfjl6o/oMKaVTSW0OEE8jtA=; b=Xi8jR3y+W9pyMXzyi9kOHpQzh4EWRgkn3Mdm/ZPayO8rmn0NfAnzHhWtH+PqwyTAvw aGAQ+rNUZddkpfRTm8ywCK7rVQ0N8YdUBJvCiUI/siHm5kF12ncdL46dGViY3UAaiPEp SDhohw/xKAyYAZeCvaSpGmqa/lrKUf4JbH5JNTagciRF0FjS2LjFxgVtf4xZFyXgEXAk NcCMEaFwY12mtIiBTMy+YS1MJJoZV8f18o6jXrgRkpL/1gAixZwjaslqHAdI+NFW4Jyk QZlMd8DW41JO+FUyVsMdVeBN5wNZyYf1GN39uHCCcdVO5LHuoTzaJOsKHXPUC69Ph+UB YZpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlPNf+SQ/UHvuZ3wNZ5TUAA2put0Nv9idmnB3bqRjUaM1QMvoBVHIsHv6POgTiJrNUJ3wA8QmHb76lReA==
X-Received: by 10.37.244.5 with SMTP id q5mr7002388ybd.100.1476252049213; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.174.16 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR05MB282912503287BCA31D5B5E46A9CE0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MWHPR05MB282912503287BCA31D5B5E46A9CE0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:30:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEFuwkiuqhNfe8aaSyyfgkQFqtDAPeQ32=EDCPVZYckxmKqzbg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll on draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-04
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045da80afe0d0d053ea4b655"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/UCDo7APUvuakMFSMD3JhlP6Dab8>
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 06:00:53 -0000

Support.

Thanks
-Pushpasis

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net> wrote:

> RTGWG,
>
> This email starts a two week poll to gauge consensus on adopting
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-04
> as an RTGWG working group document.
>
> The BFD working group is also copied on this adoption poll.  We encourage
> participants in
> BFD working group to provide their input on the adoption poll.  And should
> this document
> be adopted as an RTGWG document, we would plan to copy the BFD WG on
> emails
> related to this document to benefit from the BFD expertise in that WG in
> the development
> of this document.
>
> Please send your comments to the RTGWG mailing list (*rtgwg@ietf.org*
> <rtgwg@ietf.org>) indicating support
> or opposition to the adoption of this document, along with the reasoning
> for that support
> or opposition.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to
> this email stating
> whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.   The response needs to
> be sent to the
> RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until
> a response has
> been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to
> the document.
>
> At this point, the document has the following IPR disclosure associated
> with it.
> *https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2739/*
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2739/>
>
> This adoption poll will end on Friday October 14th.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris and Jeff
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
>