IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 23 October 2017 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7336D13A42F; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0dToeE5fXrP; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F053913A2B8; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1622; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1508793749; x=1510003349; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=4mShM704CqqB/cJDz4C4mLkFFQ3txsDnsv+blWH7AsE=; b=OXcf2k/HBaxCyfO72vY7rhf4ikbBP9Ky63O8rHgn1o87xV+Bzs3DteNL ah6D9JPCbYeppMGYfhywRgk/bLLnbjq8+UqmpNcwu4WtAHziZhWrq8N9Q ALxrldMrUaWYndryemrId4x+2a1rcSGo4siibFn80BYTd/QlWXnFCbNt/ w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ChAABgXe5Z/4MNJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg19kbicHg3OKH49FikWNbhCCAQoYC4UYAhqEOj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFHgIEAQEhEToGBRACAQgaAiYCAgIfBgsVEAIEAQ0FiggDFRCoCIInh0sNg1MBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEPgh+CB4Zjgl6BbwUBEgEfgxSCYQWhKjwCj3mEeYIVhXqLEo0MiEMCERkBgTgBHziBA1h6FUmCZIRfdol6gSSBEQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,424,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="20476688"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Oct 2017 21:22:22 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9NLMLUt025577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:22:22 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:22:21 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:22:21 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: Rtg-dt-yang-arch <rtg-dt-yang-arch-bounces@ietf.org>, 'rtgwg-chairs' <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model
Thread-Topic: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model
Thread-Index: AQHTTERZSw16zLnd+E2yys+UvYxVJKLx8UwA
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:22:21 +0000
Message-ID: <D613D591.D12F3%acee@cisco.com>
References: <4445183E-5C0A-4D50-8C92-13E6C2B99FB8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4445183E-5C0A-4D50-8C92-13E6C2B99FB8@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D011A2E074F5DF4CB7DB7AADE9CFD48F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/UZmF0T2ISznf24ffQ5QxMXIh0cg>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:22:30 -0000

As a co-author, I am not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
Acee 

On 10/23/17, 5:17 PM, "rtgwg on behalf of Jeff Tantsura"
<rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>Dear RTGWG,
>
>The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call
>draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model
>
>The interdependencies related to draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount have been
>addressed.
>There was consensus that document is ready for the last call during the
>last IETF meeting 
>and the authors have addressed all the comments from Directorate QA
>review and YANGDOCTORS.
>Please indicate support or no-support by November 6, 2017.
>
>IPR:
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to
>this 
>email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
>The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
>received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the
>document.
>
>Thanks,
>Jeff & Chris
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtgwg mailing list
>rtgwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email