Re: Poll for WG adoption of draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 24 August 2015 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7561AD357; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IXHASH_X1=1.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XytmgMAq437M; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B071AD338; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7653; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1440443488; x=1441653088; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=buUyOf5shGOJv0ohY0HRrQBd5IV6/XsYBaUEtCteAq0=; b=eB5wwrveVgrWoTg4dYip95UnfKqdXz6J3cp4exYWNyLY4GE1fgKaadGc FXvjmMG70eIOQKKP8uWU4RUkojw/YLFHzduQU7NHssg3aVcA8VC0s9OSp oJeByjiKTrLYQ5YXeOE3O7JhjF7X0lF8WdPWDwdka388lysFW9C80ebhL 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A8BQBfa9tV/4gNJK1dgk5NVGkGgx+6WIF3hXsCHIEXOhIBAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBAQQjCkEGBRACAQgOAwMBAigDAgICMBQJCAEBBAENBYguDbFylSABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBItXhCcRAUANBAeCaYFDBZU0AYUFh2yBS4QwkGuDaiaDfnGBDjqBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.15,740,1432598400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="26599935"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2015 19:11:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (xch-rcd-018.cisco.com [173.37.102.28]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7OJBR2E024950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:11:27 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) by XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:11:26 -0500
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (173.37.183.87) by xch-rcd-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:11:26 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.223]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:11:26 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Poll for WG adoption of draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01
Thread-Topic: Poll for WG adoption of draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01
Thread-Index: AdDemvNsX+Y1YhwMR72RZWnKbKz9ygADh7KA
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:11:25 +0000
Message-ID: <D200E43C.2C7A7%acee@cisco.com>
References: <BLUPR05MB29263C888FBB793BCE8B1A3A9620@BLUPR05MB292.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR05MB29263C888FBB793BCE8B1A3A9620@BLUPR05MB292.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.18]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D200E43C2C7A7aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/UhMHXrrB2UfeGCHMGBdhx6klOXU>
Cc: "draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing@ietf.org" <draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing@ietf.org>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:11:31 -0000

I support this work as it is one mechanism for avoiding BCP 38 filtering.
Thanks,
Acee

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net<mailto:cbowers@juniper.net>>
Date: Monday, August 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Cc: "draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing@ietf.org<mailto:draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing@ietf.org>" <draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing@ietf.org<mailto:draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing@ietf.org>>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: Poll for WG adoption of draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01

RTGWG,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01 as a working group document.

“Destination/Source Routing”
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/

As was discussed in Prague, this draft is needed to support work in homenet.  It  is outside of the scope of homenet’s charter, but within the scope of RTGWG’s charter.

Please send comments to the list and state your support or opposition to RTGWG adoption of this draft.

This poll runs through the end of Monday, September 7th.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.  The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.

Thanks,
Chris and Jeff