Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 17 January 2018 21:26 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E1A12D811; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:26:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hlQkphd7W15V; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:26:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7985F126C19; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:26:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3700; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516224364; x=1517433964; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=OSy1oTWu3q/uylXKUKtTaS+aEiUPO7vDomTc5OAFzAw=; b=Xej7PV79OnOob9IWA/xPuJ4Wew5HI07or5SncHZCywquHSA3T6DCoPSW DNshnzXldZ1UUc+wNEwH0PnZc7EP8XLIH0YkM7qk0poDKhc+p5N+6aWRP Dh/GQDx51/ZBMCp3iOL5E8HWQ7+kMaVKKxnZwHQRSJ5cT2d7gkblT5hBa o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BBAQAwvl9a/4ENJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNBZnQnB4QMiiSOXoICiQeOJxSCAgoYC4UYAhqESj8YAQEBAQEBAQEBayiFIwEBAQMBAQEhETMHCwwEAgEIEQQBAQMCIwMCAgIfBgsUAQgIAgQBDQWKGwMNCBCmNYInhzoNggQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQ+FQoNAgy6Ca0QBAQEBAQGBOgESAR+DF4JlBYpXmFg9AogMiEKFA4IZhh2LXY1DQoh9AhEZAYE7AR85YFcRCG8VPYIqCYMAgU54AYoTgSWBFwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,374,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="338331391"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jan 2018 21:26:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (xch-rtp-008.cisco.com [64.101.220.148]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0HLQ3AQ003321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:26:03 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (64.101.220.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:26:02 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:26:02 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org>, "tinatsou6@gmail.com" <tinatsou6@gmail.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTir50BgZBcoJ87UqN8SvZOlgVmqN47+cA//+uFwA=
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:26:02 +0000
Message-ID: <D6852939.ECE07%acee@cisco.com>
References: <151566286178.19680.2391072298747892969.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BN3PR0201MB0867AAEB612362FFCB90FE2DF1E90@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0201MB0867AAEB612362FFCB90FE2DF1E90@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <DB1504E9AD869E47AE48C09315104178@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Uhi6ed93gNoKLbMLFXr4Wmb8lRg>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:26:06 -0000
Agree - I believe these comments apply to https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08.txt Thanks, Acee On 1/17/18, 4:18 PM, "rtgwg on behalf of Xufeng Liu" <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> wrote: >Hi Benoit, > >The comments below from Tina seem to be for a different document. Could >you please double check? > >Thanks, >- Xufeng > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 4:28 AM >> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> >> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu >> <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>; rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org; yingzhen.qu@huawei.com; >> rtgwg@ietf.org; tinatsou6@gmail.com >> Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: >>(with >> COMMENT) >> >> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>email >> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >>introductory >> paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to >>https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> OPS DIR review from Tina: >> >> I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an >> informational document. >> >> Some nits: >> >> 4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277) >> >> Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session >> >> should be >> >> Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session >> >> 7. Addressing the open problems >> >> the same could be re-used in context of >> other domains as well >> >> A period is missing in the end. >> >> Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same >>components? >> >> Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, >>it would >> be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking >>intra-domain >> topology and policy. >> >> Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB >>in FD.io >> VPP https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP ? >> > >_______________________________________________ >rtgwg mailing list >rtgwg@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
- Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-… Benoit Claise
- RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rt… Xufeng Liu
- Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rt… Acee Lindem (acee)