Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-09

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Mon, 07 January 2019 16:11 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-09
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154687749567.23321.13207113394828941966@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 08:11:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/UnA3MxMP5eIh9o5QhjAeMEbSVCI>

Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker
Review result: Has Issues

The document describes the problem and solution pretty clearly. Unfortunately,
there is no discussion of the security considerations which is not appropriate
for a document addressing an availability which is a security issue.

While microloops can form by chance, some consideration should be given to the
possibility that an attacker could induce a loop to perform a DoS attack.

Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-u… Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-s… Stewart Bryant
RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-s… stephane.litkowski
Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-s… Phillip Hallam-Baker