IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps

Yichi Xu <xuyc20@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> Tue, 12 April 2022 05:37 UTC

Return-Path: <xuyc20@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155C73A1DAD; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 22:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QXQGiwkOgfAG; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 22:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zg8tmty1ljiyny4xntqumjca.icoremail.net (zg8tmty1ljiyny4xntqumjca.icoremail.net [165.227.154.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 96A913A1DB2; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 22:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mails.tsinghua.edu.cn; s=dkim; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID; bh=oBi3n6ln7LVa9VqP3kb0U8okUNgvAx4IpNXvo6Y2Hac=; b=p 9ACyfq6X9d+T6jofvhInZSxuNYh5SDx82/qv3UCqvNRgY0x+8CCOC8tvWCc0Tmen cbYzn8sth2VSqF8NRc0AHUGZvOC9TI4E3roO4zoWSXKzNJ4ZzQOddPJp/RvDOb2N A2vDmZp991QXTTpbkqm7fpL551Dowxq6DjpleGdzcU=
Received: by ajax-webmail-web5 (Coremail) ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:36:49 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
X-Originating-IP: [183.172.60.103]
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:36:49 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
X-CM-HeaderCharset: UTF-8
From: "Yichi Xu" <xuyc20@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: "Jeff Tantsura" <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: rtgwg <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version XT5.0.13 build 20210104(ab8c30b6) Copyright (c) 2002-2022 www.mailtech.cn mispb-4df55a87-4b50-4a66-85a0-70f79cb6c8b5-tsinghua.edu.cn
In-Reply-To: <202204070906037296266@chinaunicom.cn>
References: <202204070906037296266@chinaunicom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1040728_280309947.1649741809750"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2e6e2391.495af.1801c464856.Coremail.xuyc20@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-Coremail-Locale: zh_CN
X-CM-TRANSID: zAQGZQB3i03xD1Vigq9uAw--.27759W
X-CM-SenderInfo: p0x1uj2q6ptxtovo32xlqjx3vdohv3gofq/1tbiAQEOCV7nFTfTAg ABsM
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Ur529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7IcSsGvfJ3iIAIbVAYjsxI4VW7Jw CS07vEb4IE77IF4wCS07vE1I0E4x80FVAKz4kxMIAIbVAFxVCaYxvI4VCIwcAKzIAtYxBI daVFxhVjvjDU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/VQS-h8C9vtjO4SUvljafM-u9iis>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 05:37:07 -0000

Hi all,

 

I support the creation of this APN working group, and I would like to contribute on the related work. 




Yours Sincerely,

Yichi Xu.




On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 1:15 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:


Dear RTGWG,

 

 

APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the

documents, including the scope of the problem and framework.  This topic needs

collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are

within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area.

 

RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of different options and one option for handling

such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG. 

The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN.

 

We would like to solicit the WG for opinions.  Please note that comments about

existing APN documents should be sent to apn@ietf.org.  This thread focuses on

support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a

new WG.

 

Please send your comments, support, or objectiond.

Thanks!

 

 

Cheers,

Yingzhen  Jeff

 

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email