Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 21 June 2019 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D53F1203AE; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D5z0Yv1pdn30; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7532612012B; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id w10so3894892pgj.7; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version; bh=QN0KHfrBMWt1FcTM3obVluacgtIhTaoEFX7CMrlJKos=; b=tbNUPI5T0Kx4H8nu4m4EfUs6ZiiKbc1al8YjQoto+E9JbCT5YGhELZXp8sCdARd49M tyOAlBzK/xzH6C+IRpJGSNSuGwcKmx4vjLiVd4d2zDw6NYK6XGsOXKCN6p3geaxz/ag3 +hOy1d8/ixLq4ANYcCgOxuD+6gtwwDd5/F5k5VEvFaPTn9L9kTB0MejiCz2D3M1zl/kh rBPwSwk3NvhFcezTXxh5CseIXSglhYGwn2PFaFxzg/8XhzQlXheXHY12gtKTRv27ZeWM UsFyri3rWHz0jhJ8bxwNxZ9egwrGqurwVlRqhaA/yZ89nj0I642l0py1OBWnwGd40fdy xTxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version; bh=QN0KHfrBMWt1FcTM3obVluacgtIhTaoEFX7CMrlJKos=; b=YdW3zhH6UJsstZctkQ2u2RUtjbmZIFp+QVdYNQweasvSZqjNBcNAvLvEEyQdaWU3nK OO2mq5jvJ2wDRJTmO2slpTmpAbQO7BrWKD6a1CDRqTx1ri/gZ/F2NRSch9Hy4G5rAt4T 9LIrzCkepFHAlCfhDJ6H033fEXKN2ok1hQq3GW5y6MAE7EU8PRX9J1RKpl7N258Dz3zS v99Gs+mfBiI67+oboWh+I2tcMXi1Zg4X9+nWytxqF4pOnJpZlcuc/6ofbiPh5k4i2jrh +g7iwLWGPP2t64CQX8zXHkslQcxxEh8QjG5HE7cqx+BViXS3nUAmYSu6TRUqVafzONta HWsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpUSwVm+wp9AhcHD2zJkMXvN39qPYdbX9bWlqeaHT2XGjlGaT5 GrsudR+kPSJJcAwb4jPyTBsOdWPe
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy/oi3TmfVigwfG6cH9O5VHB7sJvpylfE1eJNXC8WYLRhFcy+G8ntV+dVZIjg9V1n5ncdRa7w==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:f95d:: with SMTP id q29mr20319576pgk.368.1561149596540; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (c-73-189-13-44.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.189.13.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm3227128pgb.76.2019.06.21.13.39.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:39:46 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org" <draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Message-ID: <e6b0d8b3-b842-4a9e-b502-fefa08f24e64@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <00d401d52851$5eb240e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <156090606508.6966.11992942280049135991.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <00d401d52851$5eb240e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Subject: Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-Readdle-Message-ID: e6b0d8b3-b842-4a9e-b502-fefa08f24e64@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5d0d409a_26baae9_7a11"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Vh79-1SS7xPYdu8XhcmYqB9VXck>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:39:59 -0000

Tom,

Thanks for your comments!
Co-authors - please work on these, I’d also expect you to have them incorporated in the version to be presented at IETF105.

Cheers,
Jeff
On Jun 21, 2019, 9:50 AM -0700, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, wrote:
> The challenge I have in reviewing this I-D is the lack of references in
> the YANG modules for the objects and actions defined therein. I like to
> have references since they tell me how much I should expect to
> understand, how familiar I should be with the material.
>
> Here we now have references for the YANG import statements (which is
> good) but we should also have references for many of the YANG
> statements; look for example at
> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-15
> for an I-D with a comprehensive list of references in the YANG module.
>
> It may be that here RFC 2697, RFC 2698, RFC3289 are all I need to know
> but I would like to be told that before I start looking into the YANG.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "IETF Secretariat" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:01 AM
>
> > The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state
> > Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Jeff Tantsura)
> >
> > The document is available at
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtgwg mailing list
> > rtgwg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> >
>