Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 19 February 2018 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54818120721; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:35:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo@ietf.org, Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, uma.chunduri@huawei.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.72.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151905455234.18594.12962413126040740837.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:35:52 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/XdoG2hwGlEY4j1O83bMRWOmWbPw>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:35:52 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1) Probably an editorial issue: "... SPF_DELAY to be restored to
INITIAL_SPF_DELAY. e.g., 3 seconds." 3 seconds? The previous text says
INITIAL_SPF_DELAY should be very short, e.g. 0 milliseconds...?

2) Also editorial: it would be helpful to show the state diagram right at the
beginning.