RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
"UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com> Thu, 07 April 2022 16:46 UTC
Return-Path: <ju1738@att.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDB43A0F47;
Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.805
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.805 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=att.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 7zMtiYiMxJu9; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com
[67.231.149.140])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475803A1080;
Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0288873.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
by m0288873.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id
237GJjEq018715; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:46:03 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24])
by m0288873.ppops.net-00191d01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fa3cr149t-1
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
Thu, 07 Apr 2022 12:46:02 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 237Gk0mA017899;
Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:46:01 -0400
Received: from zlp27129.vci.att.com (zlp27129.vci.att.com [135.66.87.42])
by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 237GjsPW017688
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:45:54 -0400
Received: from zlp27129.vci.att.com (zlp27129.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1])
by zlp27129.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 0ECBF4039473;
Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:45:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from MISOUT7MSGED1AC.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [135.66.184.173])
by zlp27129.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id E6FF74039465;
Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:45:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from MISOUT7MSGEX2DC.ITServices.sbc.com (135.66.184.194) by
MISOUT7MSGED1AC.ITServices.sbc.com (135.66.184.173) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id
15.1.2375.24; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:45:53 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGETA02.tmg.ad.att.com (144.160.12.220) by
MISOUT7MSGEX2DC.ITServices.sbc.com (135.66.184.194) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id
15.1.2375.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:45:53 -0400
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.174)
by edgeso2.exch.att.com (144.160.12.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.1.2375.24; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:45:51 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
b=FcAJ26TC3PU9py9R0VmPAcKONXU14Gp3wyjpTs9fBGsKwUQ6nbAazFrg8XxPuRH1qYwqJpcd9dqBQ6kdtyrPhjjT8mIicv6JHMVJRtyi8Kl0Uyv201925BQJm8kqIgPdVkDCEjXIyudlU1h52eOILAAJkUYkSFsTPwa7UnLKh1MqGCUQiMRw7f3AAXjFjC2Q0cXZCWJ6XawclL33H4c7evE9r4apldK0N5dU69JSnC9190X0188fTTw7YbtK3awebNy0wOXc8jJ/69fkyTb/goQk31JOPWzCtUB+ICw+tDefymg6MPIf7EJyHFolt+3bsOVeg7NUjMGWitHo6xDO6Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=arcselector9901;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1;
bh=AL1qeghRxNOaz1DFOk8ezBVDcZBOlsGN094FIU3x1lY=;
b=bXYIdEShed8SEZhoYUr0C0T/DawgKKJId/dWfUl6n0V83BxxTdeM+pbqEZQCJIRJCgywBU+O/Eo3Yzf2E9TW9n3moM4hQaO5rdlyyIilwdC2yO+2ucKEbOYx41kpCgTVhIvHKL0PSQLXl+8hqauU3LrukW7YEdieGQxGgduVZuxV9OSPPBaK8jL8yz1pXMbRd9/vq1T0AFiW0LKD4V5qef3E2Fdf8jr5y4eWQt+YXVBTex65cnued6THs+RroTrGmkjSjOLRItthHqZdXyoslFloPfYSrDfUsP7jP6uB75XctxQiea0C5cj8B/anDK4LX6aRX6gCjNAzx0cAUdGV4g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass
smtp.mailfrom=att.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=att.com; dkim=pass
header.d=att.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.onmicrosoft.com;
s=selector2-att-onmicrosoft-com;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
bh=AL1qeghRxNOaz1DFOk8ezBVDcZBOlsGN094FIU3x1lY=;
b=oLd64hn7wHsQR13GZQXKFlAlfapMZo/f+fwjE0ZiLMzgAly289VggfT0KAtjg++o0rdX2Ftaf+g6RDsfv/s/4tU1bXlQwVOA+QwB+RCVAAzX4k/muP8qKvAFoFEtdUL7s/lGc87BIV5iloD4ld4bEEA21Oq/+sl91dprJdHVHgA=
Received: from MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:7d::7)
by BN7PR02MB3970.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:406:f4::26) with
Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5144.19; Thu, 7 Apr
2022 16:45:50 +0000
Received: from MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
([fe80::8053:3fde:4125:9767]) by MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
([fe80::8053:3fde:4125:9767%4]) with mapi id 15.20.5144.022; Thu, 7 Apr 2022
16:45:50 +0000
From: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs
<rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
Thread-Topic: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
Thread-Index: AQHYSRDGyrbYK1Nxpk2NMF8ilWWszqzkQmcAgABpUJA=
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:45:50 +0000
Message-ID: <MW4PR02MB73947ACA2ACF21979A3E5E75C6E69@MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <204D8DE6-F51C-4551-B1D7-1D69DBCA3626@hxcore.ol>
<CAOj+MMEv=qjPzv9jiadmjP7dXQjvA3QOdP=Bv3TCZ9c-NgPwng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEv=qjPzv9jiadmjP7dXQjvA3QOdP=Bv3TCZ9c-NgPwng@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cf851714-0d7c-43ea-d9e0-08da18b612cb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR02MB3970:EE_
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR02MB3970C8BB4A798DDA09231CE8C6E69@BN7PR02MB3970.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;
IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM;
H:MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;
SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(366004)(2906002)(82202003)(86362001)(186003)(38070700005)(9686003)(122000001)(26005)(55016003)(83380400001)(71200400001)(316002)(64756008)(8676002)(33656002)(5660300002)(4326008)(166002)(66446008)(66476007)(508600001)(66556008)(38100700002)(66946007)(966005)(110136005)(7696005)(53546011)(76116006)(6506007)(54906003)(8936002)(52536014)(82960400001);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: =?utf-8?B?OHVIWEZWNkJvWlJOa09XV1ZGZEJneTdFcGVwQTJzbXl2cE9BRTUrSHBVcGh4?=
=?utf-8?B?VWRLQmZ0TVMvV1ZhcmQ2TWFGQTBNRXhNWk04Z1V5WUY2Vy96YTlraG03a1Iv?=
=?utf-8?B?ZXhIMXhadnFyTlZPa1NqbVNBZk4vcFR0VjdyRmd3MnF4N05CT25MTFJpOTJq?=
=?utf-8?B?UlJ5TzlLRzZyZi9yQmx2SUxsMm9MQmc0QlBPT3BBL0E4emFkWkpHTHBZY1Nn?=
=?utf-8?B?THhiVkZmVUpva3JMRTBiN00rdExLNzFDSSt6RDBVZ2JDNGZQaE9IazRyMFNQ?=
=?utf-8?B?KzVRVHBXTlgxbVdxUXQ4dWoxQjcxUk1YL0c4OHlaNUMzekk5RTRjUUdkbzMw?=
=?utf-8?B?MGN6d2dDYjQrQ1BSN1hneDh3L3FKN0VBUjZ1Qnl5TXJyaWVNMjRSSU9BT294?=
=?utf-8?B?SGg0Ung5ME5vNVlORDJjL2lwN25JaXQrbzVVeXBsd3ZSUVUzQzJuSUpoV1VI?=
=?utf-8?B?dENROGIxdHFMNHQ0d1I5Y3hvdGNRMUNGTFgwZlprZitjL3I2UlExeUZjSlNx?=
=?utf-8?B?SlhSZ2hsQXBpQnNURW9ueTE3Z2dtZlJ0WEZtSFJSeXlXaDdTVkRIc0k4eWRv?=
=?utf-8?B?NHN5T1pjVDExYy9wbFRCdVVrQy9HdE5ENXlmL1RtTHNRQVdUR3laaTErRENa?=
=?utf-8?B?VmFzeTZjZWxSY0NWa3NMM05oZmJoNzgwbzBxZ0xRb0R1am9oSXpQR2hGNEhL?=
=?utf-8?B?bGJpSng3K1RWcnRkRVhhTnhmWC9WUWlwMVN6K3FGMFBBNVJDVVJZTUFWU0xr?=
=?utf-8?B?enJ6OFBCKzQyaVBkTlhuQkFtc3lPeGFSZHI2K1d6N3I1YTdQbnJPOHlPUjE3?=
=?utf-8?B?VVYrV0locElNMGhuL292aEFRUEZIQ0V3Nlh3WnU4V1hOcjE1WUNBUUxJcWdT?=
=?utf-8?B?WUZDQkVVWkNBNXc1NlhUbUwxUXRDK3dvQ0xUTG54NGtkdXVqdTI2TGhLTUtH?=
=?utf-8?B?QzJYWmxFWldzY05CcFpiS1U2b1RJR1NibCs2MXdkOG5CY2swSU1FWDVkeEYz?=
=?utf-8?B?TWpneFFweXRQRzZmNk9qWDJxSUpwRXpJNHAzNHFMcDFOaFVIZW50eTJhaWxR?=
=?utf-8?B?di9CcEdPQzZOMTV5RmE5Z21zZnpVa0xISWxacFV1YUdaTGJvOHhmRUhSMDBq?=
=?utf-8?B?Y1NLaFlaS2lzS0JqRzJQZ0kvVmc5enQrM3kzeE1DMWRlVjJqM1I1bURCY0hu?=
=?utf-8?B?bnlrNzljTmE0bytlSTFnV2FGOUVaSElGalgra0pjTnNHdnFNUVBoeGRYY205?=
=?utf-8?B?K2JRYkc5aHU3aVY3MHBHSFFkTnI3ZHVnRDZUc1FPNmhMZG95VE1lQmFSdk50?=
=?utf-8?B?c01oNmdLcitVdWhwZGZycFpnNldISENkd1V4RFdndTJ2SVJjcHFyM0w5TytQ?=
=?utf-8?B?c28wVEpOWDZrQWVmdEJmWUJDdjJkRzJya01WZmF3cjdwM0NlajVmWEdvZlBG?=
=?utf-8?B?NkdlWnV2dE9zWHVmbHIxMVp3YitORHpFaUQ0ZkdXVkpaTGJRRlY0ZFB3VHh1?=
=?utf-8?B?dkcyUzJZQjZTRUlPMWQ0THVyWnUyeENPMko2RWNhRnBSMzl1MTdJTDJ5TjV4?=
=?utf-8?B?U2cxZzEwMkszTXFEVURtWkE5NnJ4WGJHUWNvMUlpZncvVHlwMEpwWGRBZXc5?=
=?utf-8?B?Y0lGR0pRWHRIYUhLbzBILzluZ0hzakVUZCtROWN4elk3QkhzRkVlY3lKMWlT?=
=?utf-8?B?ZGhvU0UyUEQwSEdXUmhzeXFEdzlyaEM3aHEwSWM1cmhYOWUvWm1LL0lvTkVX?=
=?utf-8?B?L1ZYcjRqYlFyOElHbkFOaXI0T0oyMzhlSVR4MjhrdWNBYS9PYktXdnhUbnYv?=
=?utf-8?B?UHZKUWl1UzJDdzR0RHpvZVlJb2VBbnRUakpaWkpMdUs3Ui9VR2IzdHdKd1JF?=
=?utf-8?B?U1lFQlBtNVh5cmlxZS84TXp6SVNqZHhrbUNzVjRxUGVZUG9QN2JuTzdXY2Y1?=
=?utf-8?B?MzhKUjNuVEdQTFFrMmxvM3hoTGtXWm9oU09NcDFQNDg5UGxCSi9ZVEdPRzlX?=
=?utf-8?B?L2pQbitWNUxBSGxmQXVYUDZJVndvdVFKaERXTFhvdVdPelNPR1l5cGRhNitG?=
=?utf-8?B?WStyK015M2MzK1UrQ1FVQS8yM3FQSXlmZjJVRDMxcVBsUElEYjMyaCtjUHp5?=
=?utf-8?B?WWh0Z3NaMUgyem10TkVXQUU2S1VjZ2NNc0NDanJZemwyZUU2RFdQRW1KN0tX?=
=?utf-8?B?QXZtY0EwRkJ0eFRSbGJkbWdhSURBT0dWVGZDeUtMMVVCdnZIMWtFa2xCYjNj?=
=?utf-8?B?c3ArSnN5YWZyd0wrdjdvS3lQZDQrdTVidEhMUnJUR3c2TFRsZjBBeVNjSlJq?=
=?utf-8?Q?/W2s7BOU51V3SgDDp0?=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_MW4PR02MB73947ACA2ACF21979A3E5E75C6E69MW4PR02MB7394namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MW4PR02MB7394.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cf851714-0d7c-43ea-d9e0-08da18b612cb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Apr 2022 16:45:50.4186 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: e741d71c-c6b6-47b0-803c-0f3b32b07556
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: fuJoqJhKGU3v++M++c0RcGIkSENXzF6m5k/NAHAGHefflskBPymTbTvqVaJkQpo5
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR02MB3970
X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 8DD7A24E14C8501AE29ED1153BFE1808AD94FEAFF126EABC4D598C789A9EA9EA2
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: kwmLeXj4DQsj_OQcBiwhKA0U3a3f9cmo
X-Proofpoint-GUID: kwmLeXj4DQsj_OQcBiwhKA0U3a3f9cmo
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard
engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514
definitions=2022-04-07_03,2022-04-07_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy
score=0 phishscore=0
clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0
bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501
lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204070083
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/XrtPald2SS5k_nCwuJi0wdh-Y_M>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>,
<mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>,
<mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:46:10 -0000
+1 From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 6:29 AM To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Cc: rtg-ads@ietf.org; rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>rg>; RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps All, I believe that we should be very careful here. Adding more application awareness to the network layer means more state more complexity and much higher network cost (both OPEX and CAPEX). It also means in vast majority of cases more overhead for packets. The moment you cross network domain boundary it all breaks as this is purely unrealistic to synchronize how application A should be treated across N domains. IMO we should actually go in complete opposite direction. Instead of loading networks with application awareness let application to choose end to end path by themselves which meet their requirements. Keeping network primitive to allow basic IP forwarding while exposing different paths application packets may take will not only be much more scalable but will also allow application to adjust and tune its logic or buffering (which btw is already happening today anyway) to the actual needs. Some of this exposure is already taking place today. But there is still room for improvement. And let's keep it in mind that current networks both open as well as internal do struggle to offer end to end 8 classes of basic QoS. Thinking that bunch of IETF drafts or RFCs will suddenly allow it to properly handle lot's of Application_IDs or Slice_IDs seems to me like a wish (at best). Regards, Robert On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 7:15 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear RTGWG, APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the documents, including the scope of the problem and framework. This topic needs collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area. RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of different options and one option for handling such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG. The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN. We would like to solicit the WG for opinions. Please note that comments about existing APN documents should be sent to apn@ietf.org<mailto:apn@ietf.org>. This thread focuses on support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a new WG. Please send your comments, support, or objectiond. Thanks! Cheers, Yingzhen Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg__;!!BhdT!iUc8CE10Kf7KiD2fgHo0rCwjB8JNOmUJLpAizUYT5CwCHkdt1yyjero3Rm9ihPcGSANNI_KrWPU$>
- RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Jeff Tantsura
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Joel M. Halpern
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps hsyu
- 答复: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Feng Yang
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Gyan Mishra
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps liupengyjy@chinamobile.com
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Donald Eastlake
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps zhangs366@chinaunicom.cn
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Lin He
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps strong
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps 鱼亚锋
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Stefano Previdi IETF
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Robert Raszuk
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Linda Dunbar
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Linda Dunbar
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Robert Raszuk
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Giuseppe Fioccola
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps UTTARO, JAMES
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dhruv Dhody
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Luc-Fabrice Ndifor Ngwa [ MTN Cameroon ]
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps 庞冉(联通集团中国联通研究院-本 部)
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Adrian Farrel
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Luis M. Contreras
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Alexander Clemm
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Yichi Xu
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dirk Trossen
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps 贺鲲鹏
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Jeff Tantsura
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Liang Felix