IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 25 January 2018 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9818B12DDD2; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:02:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vWQTR0rk6FYo; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:02:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8F5F12D963; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:02:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2544; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516863752; x=1518073352; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7OQksrQLqMEtX8NcXAl34Hv4M4XIfxz1WGaAINxvexc=; b=ddu1wUd6z1MO4Ws/UKyD7XgyujzCDpIp+dQDFI7W6TEfAPjTnEdUPymM 82nJ2ZEWy3Sbp6c1kcL7550CsifPhyrBNWQyhc5K2CjADiBdp5BnXDdH6 bEl20JRXkKzNDNCNK1/jCry/sGAplIjFYHcMPxZL5j4eWaSkhMezTJU0W c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B1AQBEgGla/xbLJq1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYQodCeDXYsYj08nl1iCAgojhRgChVoUAQEBAQEBAQECayiFIwEBAQQjFUEMBAsRBAEBAwIjAwICRgkIBgEMBgIBAYoxELUFgieKYAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQ+DQoNsgWgpDIJ5gy8BAQEBAQGBOgESAYM2gmUFimCZKYgVjU2CG4Yfg3GHeop6gmCBa4gTgTw2ImBXEQgzGggbFYJnglQcGYFPQDcBjA6CPAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,409,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="1592525"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jan 2018 07:02:29 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0P72T0L025068; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 07:02:29 GMT
Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with COMMENT)
To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <151566796862.24042.431976662175888091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BN3PR0201MB08677AB229C66C38509119A4F1E90@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <ae47f9ad-ad2b-705f-d4a9-1de5ae8241c3@cisco.com> <CY1PR0201MB0875CF132F43CDFC8B59DB9EF1E20@CY1PR0201MB0875.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <6a35a5d6-7079-ca91-fe5c-4c160ae6d413@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:02:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0201MB0875CF132F43CDFC8B59DB9EF1E20@CY1PR0201MB0875.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/ZDd4tUOI3gO-Rg8R_wWFfSa27B0>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 07:02:34 -0000

Perfect. Thanks Xufeng.

B.
> Hi Benoit,
>
> We have posted an update https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-10, to address this.
>
> Thanks,
> - Xufeng
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 2:38 AM
>> To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
>> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu
>> <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>; rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with
>> COMMENT)
>>
>> Hi Xufeng,
>>> Hi Benoit and all,
>>>
>>> We used to have a full tree as Section 3, in the revision 02. We received some
>> comment to move it to an appendix. We are fine with moving it back to the
>> main body, if no more objections.
>> to be decided with your AD.
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>> Thanks,
>>> - Xufeng
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 5:53 AM
>>>> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
>>>> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu
>>>> <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>; rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org;
>>>> yingzhen.qu@huawei.com; rtgwg@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on
>>>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with
>>>> COMMENT)
>>>>
>>>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>>>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: No Objection
>>>>
>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
>>>> this introductory paragraph, however.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please refer to
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> -
>>>> COMMENT:
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> I have to refer to an appendix to find the full tree diagram.
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A,
>>>> with no forward reference. Why don't you have the full tree in a new
>>>> section, as you did in
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08#section-3
>>>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email