Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt

tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> Fri, 31 August 2018 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C590130E58 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.187
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME=2.95, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8nlOMKfR-Fo for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr10101.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.1.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 882ED130E57 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4Tn4HVOPbIKTQxKjZhTnF5EonIZaQXaevZsKibixmEI=; b=bgytHNGzKkBhRTD/GfMf+lV+7vveHYInsDaMcQ0e6WiMJV4RmxNTODvfDRTEY4hyfCxGGnaq/c6aGYoSYLtnWzBzGaT1vxnnnO0ybxgOkGhsDvSNtsFwmdSzU6uUN6VbrUmv4Y+8O+/diu5Qe/P49cMsq97I511AftTpr1hj5Ak=
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2970.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.93.17) by HE1PR0701MB2634.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.187.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1122.9; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:59:59 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2970.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d0b1:4746:e374:44d5]) by HE1PR0701MB2970.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d0b1:4746:e374:44d5%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1101.016; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:59:59 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
To: routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, Robert Wilton <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUQUwMCjuBU2f7kkO5q/LSj3XuuA==
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:59:59 +0000
Message-ID: <007301d4414c$0ddd16a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <153513080167.23068.13986732289959388709@ietfa.amsl.com> <9b09507f-aec3-eae1-cc40-823125bbb00a@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: AM5PR04CA0007.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:206:1::20) To HE1PR0701MB2970.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:3:4c::17)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfa@btconnect.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [81.131.229.47]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1PR0701MB2634; 6:EwaCc7wUIoVazWUhEJytBeXSMFbCxa+JCMY9iXcO1JyWxV+ffJZ+LnM2GKKyJN/urQc9Ly0w9lU/T0Jo4WyTMFrIokV2jhq3bOroWsc8i/hGgwC01ocLDMegKpxoVHF97WnkmsARIyj19ZCQ41KzZDf2YTG7Xw8qYMPHr2WckWr0gLW2ECo3T5Bntg/BPknEgeJRux8HKiIPN4g6dqhm0eZW2Sid5hhwtyECe7+SVg8qIvDyZ34esGfxvyOtxdAqELtN84AEPgiKvhOL/wQWkkNavIDoFGR8Vi0OOOrE/5rnaIygXjCdmzxGrp0guJQ8EGDvueK0i998DBcUfjLuY4xg/uorWKOxTERZ1zYxTu5q/PzOHHH2HKBEwhVrGhBye2DKSOXdT1Q72Ky+5UUO0kIZEVfotdyhGHRAfE6XARBdKyHjQherLM1TX/qyTNeQrofLlsssqXKi739lAccTWQ==; 5:/icZTuJ0Ug9Hfo5+YGRsga+MBIxRhDNetGyF29ZF+NFvm9rGNT+FvDpQmg0anIFVoA88wYc4+rGBhH8GlUraK7Glf36Uwcwg+ioJBHhDWxmnxtFmT6oYwb1DglDGxib9q8ZZNh5OfXTw1qAHwzCkwoSW+/kSyQLpBOHV8kFVnbI=; 7:ZyqR2D5GHYLy0459vKJ+V9B1rIN0/m5jIwrrcB9Ln662Hp38Red2B7shOerQLWIhRlVUXygo6eCk4f2aJs9EHFjHMKap7QwmfbIPmBjTtkxOfstLszxrpnp1EY+xKKHM1lzV7xuw+Nk2Mzm2xDLi8VhZHI2hr8gkKQt63GKSTgXIPem4XPLKXWRF5Om7+wB9NlVgf+gTWJ4DRG2+UGSr/M7z4js1lYyXPviIfLaAGNmVey2dP1uStBYR9YxrDG1X
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 15adf87f-ad6f-4c33-a7e9-08d60f632f28
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989137)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(5600074)(711020)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:HE1PR0701MB2634;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR0701MB2634:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR0701MB2634F5C803BFAC821C8D0B5DA20F0@HE1PR0701MB2634.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(192374486261705);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:HE1PR0701MB2634; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1PR0701MB2634;
x-forefront-prvs: 07817FCC2D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(136003)(346002)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(13464003)(54094003)(189003)(199004)(316002)(14496001)(486006)(6512007)(86362001)(86152003)(9686003)(110136005)(186003)(6436002)(1556002)(446003)(3846002)(97736004)(84392002)(6116002)(25786009)(476003)(6306002)(26005)(6486002)(14444005)(66066001)(7736002)(305945005)(8676002)(44736005)(102836004)(256004)(478600001)(966005)(14454004)(53936002)(229853002)(106356001)(2906002)(68736007)(105586002)(6246003)(5660300001)(52116002)(53546011)(6506007)(386003)(76176011)(2900100001)(81166006)(81156014)(33896004)(99286004)(5250100002)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR0701MB2634; H:HE1PR0701MB2970.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: UVl6rMa5bpwfHJl0c8IK2V34NTJkoy3AGrjx4KBPYFNCSOmUNm6VJfY+kHu703GvZFOFSBr1lItXSYosAQykoqhzwWTILm+RFi4Dm3n15utsFwXY4328+fn81sasHEfg7LHrtBEgNPZ7+JhonJY8JrSvkJxBfKnvfC0OqUG4JmGO2stuu0VvWZYPZLfXVQ2Gh+7vOwvniyRJJMEdzF07zs1E9b1mNUCveeRr2tsXBwYO5YVtSZkOy18Pods00zQRu3ziQtba3flk6624g0mp0ZkcGy1JgPuk6Bb7l1HnlPlcDQMo5HWGYEqDQizaQWoaYFEh05qNrrA0ksKhJRyXKZ5vPP9pPimSuE/7eBrX4eo=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <86E3F1ABED37354FA5BE69FDCF6C5A00@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 15adf87f-ad6f-4c33-a7e9-08d60f632f28
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Aug 2018 16:59:59.0938 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0701MB2634
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Zc-Ps6majZoTAHcF1JC0sGfujcU>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:00:05 -0000

Rob

Good to see my comments addressed.

While you are at it

- YANG module copyright is 2016 which will get fixed but makes me notice
...

- Security Considerations is not the current template; should have
Normative References to SSH and TLS

- s5.1 has
draft [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis]).
which is now an RFC

- IANA Considerations references RFC7950.  As I learnt lately, RFC6020
is better here as all RFC7950 does is point you to RFC6020

-
"MAC address in the format of H-H-H, in which H is a
 hexadecimal number of 1 to 4 bits.";

If H has a maximum of 4 bits, then you have a 12 bit address, not quite
the MAC I see these days!  I wonder if it is better to leave this out
and let readers refer to RFC6991.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Wilton" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 6:17 PM

> The -01 version fixes some of the comments raised during WG adoption,
> but further work is in progress to improve the language, so expect a
> properly updated version before the IETF 103.
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
> On 24/08/2018 18:13, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of
the IETF.
> >
> >          Title           : YANG Data Model for ARP
> >          Authors         : Feng Zheng
> >                            Bo Wu
> >                            Robert Wilton
> >                            Xiaojian Ding
> > Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
> > Pages           : 17
> > Date            : 2018-08-24
> >
> > Abstract:
> >     This document defines a YANG data model for the management of
the
> >     Address Resolution Protocol (ARP).  It extends the basic ARP
> >     functionality contained in the ietf-ip YANG data model, defined
in
> >     RFC 8344, to provide management of optional ARP features and
> >     statistics.
> >
> >     The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
> >     Management Datastore Architecture defined in RFC 8342.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
> >
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtgwg mailing list
> > rtgwg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> > .
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg