IGP TE Metric Extensions
Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com> Thu, 31 May 2018 01:07 UTC
Return-Path: <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87CC12D72F for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 18:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2D1mTvhlY52m for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 18:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0513E12EBA5 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2018 18:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id o185-v6so23892254iod.0 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2018 18:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Nkrl5fwNMeahO/5o+NtY6whFCo/gYaUZWGbkG0yXD30=; b=h2RB9NIOWEmTvf+xJXmohR6pjRG5+abHxCrdP+WlN2qOW/3wR7jEgoTI8qQH5FJPC9 ZhSHXd4kFXsAvxKMZScZpoCPjoazfr4OWbq1nzdW31PEuabt2Y/eaWleKhskq+pos/Wm iBnmd9lqiIEFWjeSoYvM5keAph3yl9V4cSHE/9BVFWmVDCaYXsO812inxgxjVJjCYjO6 KeR8JuNclBvnp+2NZDMOtTOsybvnPQ7Lo7VY6yAcNqXKSjZp7Y0om+2Vh96EX+UbviPw /9+QAdDeagwaDAupB3R/wgAu0fkFTlepPeDYX10LPFAySzwu+FRemmZdh6qWXHDADOvU sKZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Nkrl5fwNMeahO/5o+NtY6whFCo/gYaUZWGbkG0yXD30=; b=tKrUGkrPag3kPbMZWSu9TEj+psgDwIDhysP4BQ00R3OaOj9ISMierPYHBAblqNZYa9 e30T4fM3FcNl4+uVKrsMNfS3F5QVlqNouJIgqRG/O5X/YdH3Mrha7mjMhmEIdUaF87aR WU+fxVn1vvgjBe96rkjoTlzhT4R1Q2tZdcptrEOteQI3Z8KuqTyNvw8vLBFcVKy1zFw/ ZlYe7xL/AeJoiheFJrO7ja8JDv7Y6XoH6Jh92+TtTu1cqpmA6WysGiixxe2ngDqB0Waa thyv+/6D8+UZzcHZJorb+UTlX4ZXCGl/Y5uo0rdiCinn+JDEHYzLtsde+ElxuTir375+ w+CQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwebOmf0SMUN4ycK+GqIypZRDxQVjVzAkNDZ4aa7YhrEl271tF58 sR4rh86TqYov9r/KYVo216CqTA3Hqvp3K1nCrKV7ug==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJUd8pdL12BwluzNKpA+Rz0BEKfbLZJEIJL6VTq/wc/+2p+DvBp2HtQ9yhtREYl70CkF2er8lvy7hoaUgsquYM=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:98ca:: with SMTP id a193-v6mr4704865ioe.254.1527728818943; Wed, 30 May 2018 18:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a02:9802:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 30 May 2018 18:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 06:36:58 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKz0y8zTE_ZkN6_MdXF0hxoRJG81TpBJAk9vtvjYmzWpY6=FHw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: IGP TE Metric Extensions
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009102b5056d7615d3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/aKTPrFRQs1wyLc2Ujg_0MQKJ2ec>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 01:07:02 -0000
Both RFC 7810 and RFC 7471 say that: The measurement interval, any filter coefficients, and any advertisement intervals MUST be configurable per sub-TLV. Additionally, the default measurement interval for all sub-TLVs SHOULD be 30 seconds. However, both RFCs initially say that they only describe mechanisms for disseminating performance information and methods of measurements is outside their scope. Moreover, for a first time reader, it seems to suggest that the measurement interval and filter coefficient must be supported and configurable under the IGP. In a system supporting multiple IGPs, I would expect that they be implemented outside the IGP and the IGPs just disseminate the information provided to them. Thoughts, especially from an implementation standpoint? Regards, Muthu
- IGP TE Metric Extensions Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
- Re: IGP TE Metric Extensions Jeff Tantsura